Possible Warp Drive Physics: The Alcubierre Drive

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the theoretical concept of the Alcubierre warp drive, exploring its feasibility within the framework of physics. Participants examine the underlying principles, mathematical formulations, and the implications of negative mass and exotic matter in the context of warp drive technology.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express skepticism about the possibility of warp drive, suggesting it remains largely conjectural.
  • Others note that while the concept has a theoretical basis in physics, it hinges on the existence of negative mass, which has not been observed.
  • There are claims that the mathematics involved is sound, but it does not necessarily correlate to a physically realizable phenomenon.
  • One participant references a NASA paper by Sonny White, indicating that it discusses experiments related to the theory, although the specifics of using baryonic matter are questioned.
  • Concerns are raised about the necessity of exotic matter to create the required spacetime geometry, with some arguing that current understanding does not support its physical existence.
  • A participant mentions historical work by Harold G. White and Eric W. Davis, suggesting that baryonic matter might mathematically exhibit properties akin to dark energy, potentially reducing the need for exotic matter.
  • There is a mention of inconclusive experimental results from NASA, with expectations that future experiments may yield similar outcomes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the feasibility of the Alcubierre drive, with multiple competing views regarding the role of negative mass and exotic matter, as well as the implications of existing theoretical frameworks.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the reliance on unproven assumptions regarding negative mass and exotic matter, as well as the lack of conclusive experimental evidence supporting the theoretical models discussed.

Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe? I mean it's just conjecture as far as I know at this point. I wouldn't say it's IMPOSSIBLE to warp spacetime because planets do it just by having mass. Can you do it enough on a smaller scale to reasonably move a spaceship somewhere you point it... no idea.
 
swampwiz said:
Is this "warp drive" physics really possible?
No. It DOES have a sort-of basis in physics, but not likely in reality since it requires negative mass which as far as can be determined is not a real thing.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CalcNerd
The maths is fine. It's not at all clear that it describes anything that can actually exist, since it requires negative mass matter, which we've never seen. Not to mention that we don't have any maths to describe the bubble forming or collapsing, only existing.
 
cosmik debris said:
I seem to recall, but can't find, that he has some method for using baryonic matter.

There's no way to produce this kind of spacetime geometry using only baryonic matter. You need "exotic matter", which basically means "can be described mathematically, but there's no evidence that it's actually physically possible".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CalcNerd
PeterDonis said:
There's no way to produce this kind of spacetime geometry using only baryonic matter. You need "exotic matter", which basically means "can be described mathematically, but there's no evidence that it's actually physically possible".

Yes, I understand this is current thinking.

This extract from Wikipedia (yes, I know):

"The theoretical framework for the experiments dates back to work by Harold G. White from 2003 as well as work by White and Eric W. Davis from 2006 that was published in the AIP, where they also consider how baryonic matter could, at least mathematically, adopt characteristics of dark energy (see section below). In the process, they described how a toroidal positive energy density may result in a spherical negative-pressure region, possibly eliminating the need for actual exotic matter.[2][4]"

I know I have seen this in a paper somewhere. I will try to find it.

Cheers
 
cosmik debris said:
I know I have seen this in a paper somewhere.

AFAIK the only "papers" on this are the ones by the NASA engineers. They apparently have enough taxpayer money to have run some experiments, all of which so far have been inconclusive. I would expect further experiments they run to continue to be inconclusive.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K