Potential and Electric Field near a Charged CD Disk

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the electric potential near a charged disk, particularly for a student struggling with the integration involved in calculating potential from a non-uniform charge distribution. The formula for electric potential, V = (kq) / r, is noted, but the complexity arises from needing to integrate over small annuli of the disk to account for varying charge density. A detailed explanation of the integration process is provided, emphasizing the need for a solid grasp of calculus, specifically elementary integration and triple integrals derived from Poisson's equation. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between charge density and potential, as well as the geometric considerations involved in the calculations. Overall, the thread underscores the necessity of foundational knowledge in physics and mathematics to tackle such problems effectively.
cherry
Messages
25
Reaction score
6
Homework Statement
A CD disk of radius ( R = 1 cm) is sprayed with a charged paint so that the charge varies continually with radial distance r from the center in the following manner: σ = - (3.5 C/m)r / R.
a) Find the potential at a point z = 5 cm above the center.
b) Find the strength of the electric field at this location.
Relevant Equations
V = kq/r
Hi! I am a very lost physics student here.

I got a) but I have no idea how.
The formula I used was from an online source and it was:
IMG_9ED12AC856A2-1.jpeg


I think I need a contextual explanation of this formula before I attempt b).

My understanding of electric potential is that it is NOT potential energy, but rather energy per unit charge. I also know that the general formula for V is V = (kq) / r. Based on the question, it seems like the disk does not have a uniform charge distribution ("varies continually"). I also know that the distance between the charge and the disk (not the center) is expressed by sqrt( R^2 + z^2). That's about how far I understand this question.

Help would be much appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cherry said:
sqrt( R^2 + z^2)
That's the distance from the given point to a point at the edge of the disc. For a point at radius r on the disc… well I'm sure you can figure that out.
The first step in the formula you found is elementary integration. You consider a small annulus of the disc between radii r and r+dr. Write down the charge on that annulus and divide it by the distance to the point to find the potential due to that annulus. Then integrate, i.e. add those up for all such annuli.

If you do not understand that then you need to take a refresher on integration.
 
The general understanding is that the electrostatic potential is a volume, that is triple, integral of the charge density ##\rho(\vec{x})##, and the general formula is obtained by solving Poisson's equation for electrostatics and it is given by
$$V(\vec{x})=\int\frac{\rho (\vec{x'})}{|\vec{x}-\vec{x'}|}d^3\vec{x'}$$
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisson's_equation

Now of course I understand that this bizarre formula might baffle you. It can be simplified to a double or single integral depending if the charge density ##\rho(x)## is a function of three or two or one variables, each variable corresponding to a spatial dimension. Also you might ask what are ##\vec{x}## and ##\vec{x'}##. Those are the position vectors in the field and source space respectively.

In your case this integral is simplified to a double integral. It is (in this case always, not in the general 3D case) ##|\vec{x}|=z## and ##|\vec{x'}|=r## where r the distance from the center of the disk. You will also need that also in our case (not in the general 3D case) it is ##d^3\vec{x'}=rdrd\phi## that is the surface element in polar coordinates. Also that for two vectors ##a,b## it is $$|\vec{a}-\vec{b}|=\sqrt{|\vec{a}|^2+|\vec{b}|^2-2|\vec{a}||\vec{b}|\cos(\vec{a},\vec{b})}$$ where ##(\vec{a},\vec{b})## is the angle between vectors a, b.

I know that this whole post of mine might baffle you right in the middle of your brain. If that's the case just ignore it and follow @haruspex post.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top