Potential difference between two cylinders

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the potential difference between two cylinders using concepts from electrostatics, specifically involving infinite charged cylinders and lines. The original poster presents a problem that involves applying Gauss' law and comparing different methods of calculating potential differences.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand why two different approaches to calculating potential differences yield the same results, one using Gauss' law and the other using the potential of an infinite line. Participants explore the relationship between the fields and potentials of infinite cylinders and lines.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants engaging in clarifying the reasoning behind the equivalence of the two methods. Some guidance is provided regarding the symmetry of the potentials and fields of the charged objects, but no consensus has been reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of using different mathematical expressions for potential and the conditions under which they apply, particularly focusing on the assumptions of symmetry and charge distribution.

aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
I need help with the attached exercise. Problem is not that I am not able to do it. You can find the field of an infinite cylinder with Gauss' law and then use that to find the potential difference.
My solutions notes however do it in a slightly different way, still arriving at the correct results. They use the expression for the potential of an infinite line:

V(r) = −1/(4\pi\epsilon0)(2Q/L) ln(r/R0)

And simply use that to calculate the potential difference. Can someone explain to me why this would yield the same result?
 

Attachments

  • em2-39.jpg
    em2-39.jpg
    17.3 KB · Views: 863
Physics news on Phys.org
hi aaaa202!
aaaa202 said:
They use the expression for the potential of an infinite line:

V(r) = −1/(4\pi\epsilon0)(2Q/L) ln(r/R0)

And simply use that to calculate the potential difference. Can someone explain to me why this would yield the same result?

an infinite uniformly charged line and an infinite uniformly charged cylinder clearly both have cylindrically symmetric potentials (and fields)

so any cylinder larger than both will be an equipotential surface, and so from Gauss' law, if the enclosed charge-per-length is the same, so will be the fields (and the potentials) :wink:
 
Hmm okay. So is it because you mightaswell view the field of an infinite cylinder with charge Q as that of an infinite line placed along the center of the cylinder with the same charge?
 
outside the cylinder, yes! :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K