Potential Due to a Collection Charges

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of electric potential due to a collection of charges, specifically focusing on the potential created by two protons and the implications of placing a third proton in between them. Participants explore the relationship between electric field and potential, questioning how distance is treated in the context of scalar quantities.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the definition of electric potential and its dependence on the configuration of charges. There is confusion regarding the relationship between electric field and potential, particularly in scenarios where the electric field is perceived to be zero. Some participants attempt to clarify that potential can exist even without an electric field, leading to further exploration of the mathematical relationships involved.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering differing viewpoints on the relationship between electric field and potential. Some guidance has been provided regarding the integration of electric fields to determine potential differences, and the idea that potential can be defined relative to a reference point has been acknowledged. Multiple interpretations of the concepts are being explored without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the implications of their assumptions about electric fields and potentials, particularly in the context of specific charge configurations. There is an acknowledgment that potential can be defined arbitrarily, which may influence their understanding of the problem.

simo
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
My text reads for Potential Due to a Collection Charges:

1/(4πє) ∑ q/r

I'm consfused about the distance and how it's treated as a scalar.

Let's say you want to calculated the potential between two protons. If a proton (or electron) is placed in the middle, there will be no net force and therefore no net electric field. With no electric field, you can have no potential, right? If you use the equation above, you get a potential.

Ex)
If the field point was 1 meter away from each proton, you would get the same potential as that of a field point 1 meter away from a particle with charge 2e(+).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, I think I figured it out. See if you can follow my logic.

First of all, the potential is whatever you define it to be because you can add a constant.

For the proton in the middle of two other protons, its potential is the same as a proton the same distance away from a particle of charge 2e+. However, this potential is a maximum for the case that the proton is between two protons and is constant everywhere between. For the latter case, the potential can increase if the field point is moved closer the the 2e+ particle.

I used Gauss's Law to figure this out.
 
simo said:
With no electric field, you can have no potential, right?

That is not correct. With no electric field you have no potential difference. There can most certainly still be a potential.

If you integrate the negative Electric field dot distance you get the potential difference. To get the potential at a certain point you just integrate from infinity to the point of interest.
 
Last edited:
Right, initially I thought there was no field because I calculated it to equal zero. Then I realized that the potential is relative and can have whatever value. This material is best understood if you graph the potentials for the two cases.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K