Potential due to a finite charged wire

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric potential at point O due to a finite charged wire configuration. The potential contributions from the leftmost, semicircular, and rightmost sections of the wire are derived using integrals, leading to a total potential expression of V(O) = (λ(π + ln(9))) / (4πε₀). Symmetry is highlighted, confirming that the left and right straight sections yield equal potential at point O. A correction was made in the calculations, thanks to input from another user. The conversation emphasizes the importance of symmetry in electric potential calculations.
lorenz0
Messages
151
Reaction score
28
Homework Statement
A wire of finite length has linear positive charge density ##\lambda##
What is the potential at point O?
Relevant Equations
##V(r)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 r}##
Considering a reference frame with ##x=0## at the leftmost point I have for the leftmost piece of wire: ##\int_{x=0}^{x=2R}\frac{\lambda dx}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 (3R-x)}=\frac{\lambda ln(3)}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}##.
The potential at O due to the semicircular piece of wire at the center is ##\int_{\theta=0}^{\theta=\pi}\frac{\lambda Rd\theta}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 R}=\frac{\lambda}{4\varepsilon_0}##.
The potential at O due to the rightmost piece of wire is, by symmetry, the same as that due to the leftmost piece of wire ##(\int_{x=R}^{x=3R}\frac{\lambda dx}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 x}=\frac{\lambda ln(3)}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}).##

So, the total potential at O is ##V(O)=2\frac{\lambda ln(3)}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}+\frac{\lambda}{4\varepsilon_0}=\frac{\lambda(\pi+ln(9))}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}##.

Does this make sense? Thanks
 

Attachments

  • potential_wire.png
    potential_wire.png
    2.4 KB · Views: 149
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Wouldn't the left and right straight sections yield the same potential at O :wideeyed: ? (you know, symmetry and all that...)

##\ ##
 
lorenz0 said:
##(4R+x)##? How do you get that?
 
BvU said:
Wouldn't the left and right straight sections yield the same potential at O :wideeyed: ? (you know, symmetry and all that...)

##\ ##
Yes; I have edited my answer, thanks.
 
That was a mistake, which I have corrected thanks to user BvU.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
Back
Top