Potential due to a uniformly charged sphere

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electrical potential inside a uniformly charged sphere, specifically for the region where the radius \( r \) is less than \( R \). The potential \( V \) is derived using the formula \( V = -\int_{\infty}^{R} \frac{kQ}{r^2}\,dr - \int_{R}^{r}(0)\,dr = \frac{kQ}{R} \). Participants clarify that the calculation involves adding two components: the change in potential from infinity to \( R \) and the change from \( R \) to \( r \). The negative sign in the electric field equation \( E = -\frac{\partial V}{\partial r} \) is emphasized as crucial for understanding the relationship between potential and electric field.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric potential and electric fields
  • Familiarity with calculus, specifically integration
  • Knowledge of the concept of work done against an electric field
  • Basic principles of electrostatics, particularly for uniformly charged spheres
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric potential for different charge distributions
  • Learn about Gauss's Law and its applications in electrostatics
  • Explore the concept of electric field lines and their relation to potential
  • Investigate the implications of potential energy in electric fields
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding electrostatics and electrical potential calculations.

gracy
Messages
2,486
Reaction score
83
http://www.phys.uri.edu/gerhard/PHY204/tsl93.pdf
To find electrical potential at r<R
I want to know why should we subtract
##V##=-##\int_∞^R\frac{kQ}{r^2}\,dr##-##\int_R^r(0)\,dr##=##\frac{kQ}{R}##
I don't know why are we subtracting these two?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
gracy said:
I don't know why are we subtracting these two?
You are actually adding two pieces: (1) change in potential from ∞ to R, (2) change in potential from R to r.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gracy
Doc Al said:
You are actually adding two pieces:
Just because
##E##=##-\frac{∂V}{∂r}##

Negative sign!
 
gracy said:
Negative sign!
Yep!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gracy
Doc Al said:
You are actually adding two pieces
And why adding them gives potential at r<R?
 
gracy said:
And why adding them gives potential at r<R?
The work done against the electric field (which is the potential) in going from "A" to "C" equals the work done from A to B plus the work done from B to C.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gracy
potential at infinity is zero,as we move in the direction of electric field the potential increases .Moving from infinity to R gives potential at R (integration with upper and lower limits i.e final and initial positions being infinity and R),right?
 
gracy said:
potential at infinity is zero,as we move in the direction of electric field the potential increases .Moving from infinity to R gives potential at R (integration with upper and lower limits i.e final and initial positions being infinity and R),right?
Right.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gracy
Then Moving from R to r (initial and final points being R and r respectively)gives
1)potential at r
OR
2)Change in potential while going from R to r
which one?
 
  • #10
gracy said:
Then Moving from R to r (initial and final points being R and r respectively)gives
1)potential at r
OR
2)Change in potential while going from R to r
which one?
Number 2: The change in potential. (The potential itself is defined as work from infinity to r.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gracy

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
851