Potential Energy & Conservative Forces #20

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving two blocks colliding and compressing a spring, focusing on the conservation of energy principle to find the spring's force constant. The subject area includes concepts of potential energy, kinetic energy, and elastic forces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the conservation of energy equation, questioning the values used for initial and final speeds, as well as the compression of the spring. Some participants express confusion over negative results and arithmetic errors in their calculations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants attempting to clarify their calculations and assumptions. Some guidance has been offered regarding the correct values to use for the velocities after the collision, and there is an acknowledgment of mistakes in previous calculations.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on ensuring both masses are treated as moving with the same speed after the collision, which is critical for applying the conservation of energy correctly. Participants are also addressing potential arithmetic errors that could affect their results.

UCrazyBeautifulU
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Two blocks, each with a mass m = 0.348 kg, can slide without friction on a horizontal surface. Initially, block 1 is in motion with a speed v = 1.56 m/s; block 2 is at rest. When block 1 collides with block 2, a spring bumper on block 1 is compressed. Maximum compression of the spring occurs when the two blocks move with the same speed, v/2 = 0.780 m/s. If the maximum compression of the spring is 1.88 cm, what is its force constant?

I was figuring it out using hte conservatin of energy principle, but that isn't working:

1/2mu^2 + 1/2mu_2^2 + 1/2kx^2 = 1/2mv^2 + 1/2m_2v_2^2 + 1/2kx_2^2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why isn't it working? What values are you using for the initial/final speeds of the masses and the compression of the spring?
 
.5(0.348)(1.56^2) + .5(.348)(0^2) + .5k(0^2) = .5(.348)(1.56^2) + .5(.348)(v/2)^2 + .5k(1.88 x 10^-2)^2

those are all my numbers...is that right?
 
Let both masses have the same velocity after impact.
 
Last edited:
i end up with a negative answer.
 
Did you use v/2 = 0.78 m/s instead of 1.56 on the rhs of the eqn ?
 
yeah, i did, then you have to square it. I wrote my numbers up above that I was using in the equation.

YOu end up with -0.105862 = 706.88(k)
 
.5(0.348)(1.56^2) + .5(.348)(0^2) + .5k(0^2) = .5(0.348)(1.56^2) = 0.4234464

What do you get?
 
.5k(0^2) = 0

so how do I get anything when I can't even solve for k?
 
  • #10
The lhs of your eqn = 0.4234464

The rhs of your eqn = 0.217232 + 1.7672E-04 * k

Solve for k.

Check your arithmetic.
 
  • #11
i get

0.423 = 0.529308 + 1.7672 x 10^-4

Which gives a negative answer.Using what you wrote above I get k = 1166.9 and that answer was not correct.
 
  • #12
My mistake: 0.217232 + 1.7672E-04 * k should be 0.2117232 + 1.7672E-04 * k

Which gives k = 1.2 KN/m

You had 0.529308 on the rhs. You will get that if you used v = 1.56 instead of v = 0.78.
Both masses have the same speed, 0.78 m/s.
 
  • #13
UCrazyBeautifulU said:
.5(0.348)(1.56^2) + .5(.348)(0^2) + .5k(0^2) = .5(.348)(1.56^2) + .5(.348)(v/2)^2 + .5k(1.88 x 10^-2)^2

those are all my numbers...is that right?
No. As Fermat has already pointed out, both masses move with the same speed (0.780 m/s) when the spring is fully compressed.
 
  • #14
Thank you!
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K