Null_Void
- 76
- 9
Is this the equation we should be concerned with?PeroK said:You need to think about what happens after the equilibrium point.
##Fx - μm_2gx - 1/2kx^2 = -1/2m_2v^2##
Is this the equation we should be concerned with?PeroK said:You need to think about what happens after the equilibrium point.
No. That's no use, as you yourself have repeatedly complained about the ##v^2## term being a nuisance.Null_Void said:Is this the equation we should be concerned with?
##Fx - μm_2gx - 1/2kx^2 = -1/2m_2v^2##
Will it perform simple harmonic motion about the equilibrium point?PeroK said:No. That's no use, as you yourself have repeatedly complained about the ##v^2## term being a nuisance.
No.Null_Void said:Will it perform simple harmonic motion about the equilibrium point?
Suppose there is still a velocity term at that point. What would happen if you were to make F just a tiny bit less?Null_Void said:But an extra velocity term ##v## is still present? What value should ##v## take in this case
## Fx - 1/2kx^2 - μm_2gx= 0##PeroK said:No.
It is. It's useful because that's the point at which ##m_2## stops. And that's the point at which the force in the spring is at its maximum.Null_Void said:## Fx - 1/2kx^2 - μm_2gx= 0##
Is this the right equation?
Ah I get it now. Combining this with the equation @haruspex pointed out, I'll getPeroK said:It is. It's useful because that's the point at which ##m_2## stops. And that's the point at which the force in the spring is at its maximum.