High School Potential energy in standing wave compared to traveling wave

Click For Summary
In the discussion on potential energy in standing versus traveling waves, it is noted that elements of a traveling wave at maximum displacement have zero instantaneous velocity and minimum tension, resulting in lower energy compared to other string elements. However, a sinusoidally contoured string, which is longer than a straight string, possesses greater elastic potential energy. The relationship between kinetic and potential energy in standing waves is highlighted, where maximum displacement leads to zero kinetic energy. At nodes, both kinetic and potential energy equal zero, while at antinodes, potential energy reaches its maximum. This analysis illustrates the energy dynamics in both wave types.
versine
Messages
24
Reaction score
5
TL;DR
Why is the potential energy of a standing wave maximum when the displacement is maximum, but for a traveling wave, it is when the displacement is zero?
From hyperphysics, "The unique point in the case of the traveling wave in the string is the element of the string that is at the maximum displacement as the wave passes. That element has a zero instantaneous velocity perpendicular to the straight string configuration, and as the wave goes "over the hump", it also has minimum tension. So that element of the string has the minimum energy compared to other elements along the sinusoidal contour. This does not imply that a wavelength of the sinusoidally contoured string has less potential energy than the straight string. The sinusoidally contoured string is longer than a wavelength of straight string and will have greater elastic potential energy. As that sinusoidal contour moves along the string, it transports energy. "

Doesn't this also apply to a standing wave since it is a superposition of two traveling waves?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think for standing waves
kinetic energy + potential energy = f(x) a function depending on the position.
It means when displacement is maximum kinetic energy is zero.
At nodes kinetic energy = potential energy = f(x) = 0. At antinodes f(x) has maximum value.
 
Topic about reference frames, center of rotation, postion of origin etc Comoving ref. frame is frame that is attached to moving object, does that mean, in that frame translation and rotation of object is zero, because origin and axes(x,y,z) are fixed to object? Is it same if you place origin of frame at object center of mass or at object tail? What type of comoving frame exist? What is lab frame? If we talk about center of rotation do we always need to specified from what frame we observe?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
4K