Potential Energy of a Two Spring, Two Mass System

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the total potential energy of a system consisting of two masses, each suspended by identical springs. The original poster attempts to derive an expression for the total potential energy, considering both gravitational and spring potential energy contributions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the formulation of potential energy in the context of the system's configuration and question the assumptions made regarding the forces acting on the springs.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, raising questions about the correct interpretation of forces and potential energy contributions. Some guidance has been offered regarding the equilibrium conditions and the relationship between the masses and springs, but no consensus has been reached on the correct formulation.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the implications of the masses being connected and how that affects the potential energy calculations. Participants are also considering the implications of evaluating the system at equilibrium and the potential for double counting contributions from the masses.

logic smogic
Messages
54
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the total potential energy described by a system consisting of a mass hanging by a spring, connected to a second mass also hanging by a spring. Assume that the masses are the same, and the springs are identical (in spring constant and length).

Homework Equations


V_{spring} = \frac{1}{2} k y^{2}
V_{gravity} = -mgy

The Attempt at a Solution


This is one-dimensional, so I'm working only with "y". I'm calling "up" the positive y-direction, and I'm labeling the top mass "1" and the bottom mass "2".

The initial position of mass 1 will be y_{01} and the initial position of mass 2 will be y_{02}.

I'm assuming that (is this right?):

V_{total} = V_{spring,1} + V_{spring,2} + V_{gravity,1} + V_{gravity,2}

So shouldn't the answer just be:

V_{total} = \frac{1}{2} k (y_{1} - y_{01})^{2} + \frac{1}{2} k [(y_{2}-y_{02})-(y_{1}-y_{01})]^{2} - mgy_{1} - mgy_{2}

But this can't be right! Since they're both conservative forces (gravity and the springs), doesn't the derivative need to vanish when evaluated at the initial values? It doesn't for the gravity potential parts. Help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The negative of the derivative of V is the force. Why should the force vanish at any point?

Where does it reflect in your equation that the masses are joined in the manner described? This looks like the total PE of any two masses hung by different springs.

Consider the fact that the force on the upper spring is the weight of both the masses, while that on the lower one is just the weight of one mass. Equate the elastic forces to the weights on each spring. Take the point to which the top spring is connected to be baseline for gravitational PE.
 
The negative of the derivative of V is the force. Why should the force vanish at any point?

Because we're evalutating the system in equilibrium, right?

Where does it reflect in your equation that the masses are joined in the manner described? This looks like the total PE of any two masses hung by different springs.

Well, I'm saying that the total potential energy contribution from the springs is,

V_{springs} = \frac{1}{2} k (y_{1} - y_{01})^{2} + \frac{1}{2} k [(y_{2}-y_{02})-(y_{1}-y_{01})]^{2}

...where you can see I've accommodated for the coupling in the second term. I've checked this with a horizontal 2-spring/mass system, and it seems consistent.

Consider the fact that the force on the upper spring is the weight of both the masses, while that on the lower one is just the weight of one mass. Equate the elastic forces to the weights on each spring. Take the point to which the top spring is connected to be baseline for gravitational PE.

Wouldn't I be double counting the mass on the bottom? If I get what you're suggesting, the potential energy from gravity would be,

V_{gravity} = -2mgy_{1} - mg(y_{2}-y_{1})

Here's the trick, though - this contribution is still linear in y_{1} and y_{2} (so I can't form a tensor with it), and it doesn't vanish after differentiation.
 
logic smogic said:
Because we're evalutating the system in equilibrium, right?

You are correct. If you evaluate \partial V/\partial y_{1} and equate it to zero, you will get an equation in y1. But you don't get to put in the value to make it zero, which I think you were trying to do. Same for y2. Then you can solve for y1 and y2.

If we keep things a bit simple, the solution becomes easy. If the lower spring stretches by a length x due to mg, how much would the upper one stretch due to 2mg? This will give you the positions of the two masses, and hence the total PE.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K