Potential Energy of Relativistic Particles in Coulomb Field

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The potential energy of a relativistic electron in a Coulomb field is debated among physicists. According to Landau and Lifshitz in "Field Theory," the potential energy remains unchanged at ##\frac{qQ}{r}##. However, some researchers argue for a modified expression incorporating a reduced distance of ##r\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}## due to relativistic effects. This discussion highlights the historical context of Sommerfeld's derivation of the hydrogen atom's fine structure, which, despite its inaccuracies, yielded correct results without accounting for electron spin and gyrofactor.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of relativistic mechanics
  • Familiarity with Coulomb's law
  • Knowledge of Lagrangian mechanics
  • Basic concepts of quantum theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of relativistic effects on potential energy in electromagnetic fields
  • Study the Lagrangian formulation of relativistic motion
  • Explore Sommerfeld's model and its historical significance in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the role of electron spin and gyrofactor in modern physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of theoretical physics, and researchers interested in relativistic dynamics and quantum mechanics will benefit from this discussion.

reterty
Messages
30
Reaction score
2
Let us consider relativistic particle (electron) which moves with relativistic speed ##v## in the Coulomb field (in the field of a fixed heavy nucleus). The main question is what is the potential energy of a particle in such a static field? Landau and Lifshitz in their book "Field Theory" believe that the potential energy is not renormalized in any way and is equal to ##\frac{qQ}{r}##. At the same time, a number of authors of original articles on this topic introduce a reduced distance ##r\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}## into the denominator of this fraction due to the relativistic effect of the reduction in linear dimensions. Which of them is right?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess you mean the relativistic motion of a charged particle in the coulomb field of a very much heavier particle, neglecting the radiation reaction. The relativistic equation of motion in the non-covariant formalism is derived from the Lagrangian
$$L=-mc^2 \sqrt{1-\dot{\vec{x}}^2} + \frac{q Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 |\vec{x}|}.$$
It's of some historical interest since it was Sommerfeld's derivation of the fine structure of the hydrogen-atom spectrum within old quantum theory. It's kind of surprising that he got the correct result although the model is, of course, entirely wrong, i.e., it doesn't take into account the spin 1/2 of the electron and the gyrofactor 2 (both of which weren't known in 1916). That's why you find the solution in Wikipedia here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bohr–Sommerfeld_model#Relativistic_orbit
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark, PeroK and malawi_glenn
reterty said:
$r\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}$
Please note that on this website you need to use a double-$ instead of a single-$ for LaTeX to work.
$$r\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
DrGreg said:
on this website you need to use a double-$ instead of a single-$ for LaTeX to work
Or a double # for inline LaTeX (the double $ means an equation in its own paragraph).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark and vanhees71
For example: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305345527_A_New_Relativistic_Extension_of_the_Harmonic_Oscillator_Satisfying_an_Isochronicity_Principle
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
933
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 108 ·
4
Replies
108
Views
9K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
1K