Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Relativistic particle in Coulomb potential - any analytic solution?

  1. Aug 14, 2010 #1
    Is there a general analytic solution to the classical motion of a relativistic charged particle in a static Coulomb potential? Of course, the non-relativistic limit is simply Kepler's problem. Quantum effects should be ignored, but relativistic effects (such as E field transforming into B field) should be fully included.
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 14, 2010 #2
    So you want a solution that also takes into account the action of the particle's field on the external field? (radiation reaction, Schott's term?) In this case I don't think there is an exact solution. The best you can get is a perturbative method (as far as I know). If instead you mean simply a relativistic motion (no slow motion approximation), without radiation, then look, for example, the Landau-Lifsitz book.
  4. Aug 14, 2010 #3
    If you mean bound states of the electron or other charged particles in a static central Coulomb field, look (for spin 1/2 particles) at the chapter on the relativistic solution of the hydrogen atom in Dirac Principles of Quantum Mechanics (4th Ed.) page 272, or Schiff Quantum Mechanics Eq 44.26 (page 337). For spin zero particles (e.g., pions), look at Eq 42.21 in Schiff.

    Bob S
  5. Aug 14, 2010 #4
    I'm aware that the Dirac equation for a bound electron can be solved analytically. However, I'm wondering whether analytic solutions can be found for classical motion, if we ignore radiation reaction?
  6. Aug 15, 2010 #5
    Yes, in this case a closed solution exists (I already gave you a reference, but I guess you'll find lots of articles googling), but only for the spatial trajectory of the particle, not for the time dependence (this is also the case for classical Kepler motion: we can show that trajectories are elliptic, parabolic or hyperbolic, but the time dependence is not expressible in terms of elementary functions). In the relativistic case, depending on the initial conditions (and of course if the two charges have same or opposite signs) you get a whole class of solutions: spirals that fall into the center in a finite time, elliptic orbits that show precession, etc... in any case the orbits are never closed.
  7. Aug 15, 2010 #6


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 25, 2017
  8. Aug 15, 2010 #7

    George Jones

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    At your link, the non-quantum stuff that petergreat wants is given under the heading Relativistic orbit, up to, but not including, "With the quantum conditions ...".

    petergreat, notice that the equation of motion mathematically (but not physically, for reasons given by Petr Mugver) is the same as the equation of motion for an undamped harmonic oscillator under the influence of a constant additional force.
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 25, 2017
  9. Aug 15, 2010 #8
    Analytic solutions for the "classical" case (absence of radiation breaking) exist but they are very tricky to derive. I think that what you want can be seen in the third attachment of https://www.physicsforums.com/blog.php?b=1928 [Broken] blog.
    Last edited by a moderator: May 4, 2017
  10. Aug 15, 2010 #9
    Not as far as I know. The problem is that the two-bodies are accelerated and emit electromagnetic waves. Thus, the problem becomes a coupled problem about the dynamics of two point particles and the electromagnetic field evolution that they create.

    There is an approximate procedure where one can deduce a Lagrangian for a system of point charges up to terms of the order [itex]O((u/c)^{2})[/itex] - Darwin Lagrangian by neglecting the radiating degrees of freedom.

    I don't know if the Kepler problem using this Lagrangian is analytically solvable or not.
  11. Aug 15, 2010 #10
    Yes, this is correct.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook