Potential Evolutionary Origins of Artistic Sense

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheStatutoryApe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potential
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the potential evolutionary origins of artistic sense and the biological motivations behind the appreciation of art and beauty. Participants explore various theories related to sexual selection, social norms, and the functional aspects of art in relation to survival and mate attraction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that sexual selection may have driven early humans to create and appreciate art as a means of attracting mates, suggesting that those with artistic talent may have had advantages in survival.
  • Others argue that the characteristics deemed attractive in animals, including humans, are often genetically determined, and social norms influence what is considered desirable in artistic expression.
  • A viewpoint is presented that artistic ability may not have been directly selected for, but rather the skills associated with creating functional tools and weapons, which could also lead to artistic creations, were advantageous.
  • Concerns are raised about the relatively small number of artists and musicians compared to the general population, suggesting that many may have untapped creative talents due to modern distractions.
  • Some participants question the biological impetus for creating aesthetically pleasing objects, pondering why beauty is valued alongside utility in tools and art.
  • There is mention of the neurological effects of art, with speculation that artistic appreciation may engage different cognitive processes compared to utilitarian thinking.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of competing views regarding the evolutionary significance of art and beauty, with no consensus reached on the primary motivations or mechanisms involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge various assumptions about the role of genetics, social influences, and the functional versus aesthetic value of art, but these remain unresolved within the discussion.

  • #31
Jurgen Schmidhuber's model of curiosity

http://www.idsia.ch/~juergen/curioussingapore/curioussingapore.html

He has done quite a bit of work on ideas like this about how neural networks might organize.

He also has a mathematically based theory of aesthetics.

http://arxiv.org/abs/0709.0674 (note: some translation issues here, maybe)

http://www.idsia.ch/~juergen/locoart/locoart.html

Seemed like an interesting companion to the paper cited above.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
565