Potential step with E = V0; classically forbidden or allowed?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hnicholls
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potential
Click For Summary
In the discussion about a potential step where E = V0, the classification of the wave function in interval 2 (x > 0) is debated, specifically whether it is classically allowed (CA) or classically forbidden (CF). Solving the time-independent Schrödinger equation for a constant potential V(x) = V0 leads to the ordinary differential equation d^2/dx^2(y) = 0, yielding a linear solution y = Ax + b. The key focus is on determining the nature of the wave function in interval 2 to calculate probability current densities, reflection, and transmission percentages. The challenge lies in defining interval 2 appropriately as CA or CF. This classification is crucial for understanding the behavior of the wave function and its implications in quantum mechanics.
hnicholls
Messages
49
Reaction score
1
In describing a potential step where E = V0, with an interval 1 defined as x < 0 before the step and an interval 2 as x > 0 after the step, is the wave function in interval 2 classically allowed or classically forbidden, i.e. is it an oscillating function or a decaying exponential function?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try solving the time-independent Schrödinger equation for the constant potential V(x)=V0 with E=V0. What do you get?
 
you get the ordinary differential equation

d^2/dx^2(y)=0

with solution

y=Ax+b

But, what I am interested in is solving this problem by defining the wave functions in the given intervals as either classically forbidden or classically allowed and then from those values determining the probability current densities for each interval and then the reflection and transmission percentages.

But to do this, I need to determine how to define interval 2 as CA or CF.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K