Share Your Thoughts on Useless Mathematical Equation

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dink
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a mathematical observation regarding the relationship between the median of a set of integers and the sum of those integers. Specifically, it highlights that for an odd integer x, the highest whole number median is calculated as (x-1)/2, and multiplying this median by x yields the sum of all integers from 1 to x. The formula for the sum of consecutive natural numbers, n(n+1)/2, confirms this relationship. Participants clarify that the term "median" is misapplied in this context, as it pertains to sets rather than individual numbers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic arithmetic operations
  • Familiarity with the concept of median and mean in statistics
  • Knowledge of the formula for the sum of consecutive natural numbers
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the formula for the sum of consecutive integers: n(n+1)/2
  • Learn about the differences between median and mean in statistical analysis
  • Explore mathematical induction and its applications in proofs
  • Investigate the properties of odd and even integers in mathematical contexts
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, educators, students in mathematics, and anyone interested in understanding the relationships between statistical measures and arithmetic operations.

dink
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
I found this scratching away on a piece of cardboard today. I thought I might troll the board and see what people think. Bare with me for I sometimes have trouble expressing what's in my head in words.

As follows:
Take the highest whole number median of an odd integer x and multiply it by said integer and the answer is equal to the sum of the counting number integers between 1 and x included 1 and x.

Example:
Assume x = 17
Highest median of 17 = 9
9 * 17 = 153
1+2+3+4+...+15+16+17 = 153

I've also found this works for even numbers assuming median + (1/2)(or -1/2 if integer x is negative).

Its a lot of blah blah blah and I don't see any applications, perhaps even missing something blatantly obvious(it is rather late after all). Share what you think. Thanks for reading.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi

What you have discovered is just this:

The sum of consecutive natural nos is n(n+1)/2. And the median is basically the middle value. And the sum of n natural nos satisfies this. I think ur discovery is evident from the formula. It is nothing new, but, anyway, a good observation. Keep Trying. All the Best.


Sridhar
 
You can also think of it like this:

If you want to add, say, numbers 1 through 50:

1+2+3+4+...+47+48+49+50

you can rearrange them as follows:

(1+50) + (2+49) + (3+46) + ... + (25+26)

which are exactly 25 numbers, all equal to 51, hence, the sum is

51 * 25, or (50+1)*50/2
 
"bare with me"? Not likely!

You confuse things by talking about the "median" of a number.

Sets of numbers have medians, not individual numbers. Of course you meant the "median of the set of numbers 1, 2, ..., n". Of course, for a simple set like that, the median is the same as the mean. Pretty much by definition, multiplying the mean of a set of numbers by the cardinality of the set (I just could bring myself to write "the number of numbers in the set"!), n+1, gives you the sum of all the numbers.

If you had said "mean" instead of "median", it would have been obvious.
 
Thanks for your replies. Your posts remind me of the mathematical induction chapters in a few of my math books. I think my programming classes are overwriting the nerons in my brain.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K