Power Series Expanded, Arfken 5.7.16

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the expansion of the parameters ξ1 and ξ2 related to neutron energy loss during elastic collisions with nuclei of mass A, as described in Arfken 5.7.16. The parameter ξ1 is defined as ξ1 = 1 + \frac{(A-1)^2}{2A}*ln\frac{A-1}{A+1}, while the approximation for large A is ξ2 = \frac{2}{A + 2/3}. Participants are tasked with expanding both parameters in powers of A−1, demonstrating that ξ2 agrees with ξ1 through (A−1)², and identifying the difference in coefficients for the (A−1)³ term. Key mathematical tools include Taylor expansions and logarithmic series.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Taylor Expansion and its applications
  • Familiarity with logarithmic functions and their series expansions
  • Basic knowledge of elastic collisions in nuclear physics
  • Proficiency in algebraic manipulation of mathematical expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Taylor series for logarithmic functions
  • Explore the application of Taylor Expansion in physics problems
  • Learn about the behavior of particles in elastic collisions
  • Investigate higher-order approximations in mathematical physics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on nuclear physics and mathematical modeling, as well as anyone interested in advanced mathematical techniques for problem-solving in physical contexts.

citra
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The behavior of a neutron losing energy by colliding elastically with nuclei of mass A is described by a parameter ξ1,
ξ1 = 1 + [itex]\frac{(A-1)^2}{2A}[/itex]*ln[itex]\frac{A-1}{A+1}[/itex]

An approximation, good for large A, is
ξ2= [itex]\frac{2}{A+2/3}[/itex]

Expand ξ1 and ξ2 in powers of A−1. Show that ξ2 agrees with ξ1 through (A−1)2. Find the difference in the coefficients of the (A−1)3 term.

Homework Equations



Taylor Expansion, see wiki page

ln(1-x)= x+ [itex]\frac{x^2}{2}[/itex]+ [itex]\frac{x^3}{3}[/itex]+...+[itex]\frac{x^n}{n}[/itex]

ln(1+x)= x- [itex]\frac{x^2}{2}[/itex]+ [itex]\frac{x^3}{3}[/itex]+...+(-1)^(n+1)[itex]\frac{(x^n)}{n}[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



Alright so since it is in powers of A−1 I decided to substitute x=A−1. I get:

ξ1= 1+ [itex]\frac{x((1/x)-1)^2}{2}[/itex]* ln(1-x)-ln(1+x)

I use the expansions from above and substitute.
Now I do not know how to expand the entire thing from here.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
citra said:

Homework Statement


The behavior of a neutron losing energy by colliding elastically with nuclei of mass A is described by a parameter ξ1,
ξ1 = 1 + [itex]\frac{(A-1)^2}{2A}[/itex]*ln[itex]\frac{A-1}{A+1}[/itex]

An approximation, good for large A, is
ξ2= [itex]\frac{2}{A+2/3}[/itex]

Expand ξ1 and ξ2 in powers of A−1. Show that ξ2 agrees with ξ1 through (A−1)2. Find the difference in the coefficients of the (A−1)3 term.

Homework Equations



Taylor Expansion, see wiki page

ln(1-x)= x+ [itex]\frac{x^2}{2}[/itex]+ [itex]\frac{x^3}{3}[/itex]+...+[itex]\frac{x^n}{n}[/itex]

ln(1+x)= x- [itex]\frac{x^2}{2}[/itex]+ [itex]\frac{x^3}{3}[/itex]+...+(-1)^(n+1)[itex]\frac{(x^n)}{n}[/itex]
Suggestion: Use LaTeX for the entire expression instead of for just bits and pieces.

You should clean up your math a bit. Those expressions above aren't true because the series on the righthand sides have an infinite number of terms. They don't terminate with the nth term.

The Attempt at a Solution



Alright so since it is in powers of A−1 I decided to substitute x=A−1. I get:

ξ1= 1+ [itex]\frac{x((1/x)-1)^2}{2}[/itex]* ln(1-x)-ln(1+x)

I use the expansions from above and substitute.
Now I do not know how to expand the entire thing from here.
Again, what you wrote is incorrect. Use parentheses (or square brackets, etc.)!
[tex]\xi_1 = 1+\frac{x}{2}\left(\frac{1}{x}-1\right)^2[\log(1-x)-\log(1+x)][/tex]You just need to substitute the series in, combine terms, and then multiply everything out and simplify. In other words, do a bunch of algebra. Note that since you're only looking for the first few terms, those are the only ones you really need to worry about. Anything that results in higher powers of x you can ignore.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K