Power/work questions (with inclines)

  • Thread starter Thread starter dnt
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating power and work for a tractor and a fridge moving up an incline. The participants are exploring the relationship between the angle of the incline and the components of force involved in the work done against gravity.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the use of sine versus cosine in the work equation, particularly in relation to the incline's angle and the direction of the force applied. There is a focus on understanding how to correctly apply these trigonometric functions in the context of work done against gravitational forces.

Discussion Status

There is an active exploration of the concepts involved, with some participants providing insights into the reasoning behind using cosine in the work equation. Others are seeking clarification on why sine might be applicable in certain contexts, indicating a productive dialogue without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the definitions and applications of work and power in the context of inclined planes, and there is an acknowledgment of the complexities involved in interpreting the angles related to force and displacement.

dnt
Messages
238
Reaction score
0
the question states at 120 kg tractor goes up a 21 degree incline of 12.0 m in 2.5 seconds. what is the power?

ok i know power is W/T which is basically Fd/T

my question is how do you use the incline. work is Fdcos0 but i just don't see why its cosine in this question. the work is going UP so shouldn't you want to use the vertical component? meaning use sine insteand of cosine? doesn't make sense to me.



a similar question is a 185 fridge goes up 10.0 m at an angle of 11 degrees, what is the work done?

again, its going up so should we use cosine or sine? i think it should be sine but the equation says use cosine.

dont quite get it. please help. thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The work under discussion here is that done by the force pushing the object up the incline. This force has to cancel the weight component of the object, parallel to the incline, out. Is this component given by the sine or the cosine of the inclination?
 
i believe that's the sine. is that correct?
 
Correct. So the you want to calculate the work done by a force equal to [itex]W\sin(\theta)[/itex], but in the opposite direction, that pushes the object up the incline. The cosine in the work equation is applicable when the angle [itex]\theta[/itex] is given as the angle between the force and the displacement vectors. The reason why there is a [itex]\cos(\theta)[/itex] in the work equation is to get the component of the force that is parallel to the displacement. It is only this component that does work as the object is displaced. The other component, perpendicular to the displacement, does no work as the object is displaced.
 
Last edited:
Just use potential energy. But I'll show you why you use cosine anyway.
[tex]W = \int_{s_i}^{s_f} F_s ds = \int_{s_i}^{s_f} F cos(\theta)ds[/tex]
F and [tex]\theta[/tex] are constant and can be moved out of the integral. F_s is the component of F(vector) in the direction of motion, and F makes an angle [tex]\theta[/tex] with respect to a displacement [tex]\Delta r[/tex], so the component of the force vector is the direction of motion is [tex]F_s = Fcos\theta[/tex].
[tex]W = Fcos(\theta)\int_{s_i}^{s_f}ds = F cos\theta (s_f - s_i) = F cos\theta (\Delta s) = F(\Delta r) cos\theta[/tex]
 
Last edited:
andrevdh said:
Correct. So the you want to calculate the work done by a force equal to [itex]W\sin(\theta)[/itex], but in the opposite direction, that pushes the object up the incline. The cosine in the work equation is applicable when the angle [itex]\theta[/itex] is given as the angle between the force and the displacement vectors. The reason why there is a [itex]\cos(\theta)[/itex] in the work equation is to get the component of the force that is parallel to the displacement. It is only this component that does work as the object is displaced. The other component, perpendicular to the displacement, does no work as the object is displaced.

so isn't that a little misleading? why do they include cosine in the work equation when sometimes you use sine?
 
When we want to calculate the work done by a force applied to an object we need to get the component of the force that is in line with the displacement - therefore the [itex]\cos(\theta)[/itex] in the work equation. Where [itex]\theta[/itex] is the angle between the direction of the force and displacement vectors. In this case we've got the force parallel to the incline, so there is no need for the cosine. The sine comes from gettting the component of the weight parallel to the incline, which involves the angle of the incline, which is a completely different angle than the one in the work equation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K