MHB Powers function n^5+n^4=(n^5−n^3)(n−1)−(n−2)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Angel11
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Angel11
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hello again,i am back. So now i have diffrent questions while spending my time in powers for some reason that i can't explain...Anyways let's get to the point. these ones are really simular to the previous one.
n^{5}+n^{4}=(n^{5}-n^{3})*(n-1)-(n-2), n^{4}+n{3}=(n^{4}-n^{2}*(n/(n-1)). You can try to replace n by any number which is >0. And my question is:"WHY does this happen (i mean it goes a little bit into philosophical thinking rather than logical but i would like an explanation like why and 3 digit number that has the same number in every digit if you add it together and multiply the result by 37 it becomes the same number).(Whew) Also if you had the patience to read all of this and acctoully came up with an answer i want to say you are a legend (Yes)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hint: $ 3 \cdot 37 = 111 $
 
Let's look at your first equation:

$$n^5+n^4=\left(n^5-n^3\right)(n-1)-(n-2)$$

If we use $n=1$, we get:

$$2=1$$

So, it's not an identity...and we would have to use a root finding technique to get approximations for the real values of $n$ for which the equation is true:

$$n\approx0.88157969798488504310$$

$$n\approx2.6222866129011998799$$

Let's look at the second equation you gave (I assume it is the following):

$$n^4+n^3=\left(n^4-n^2\right)\left(\frac{n}{n-1}\right)$$

$$n^4+n^3=\frac{n^5-n^3}{n-1}$$

Since you stated $0<n$ we may divide through by $n^3$ to obtain:

$$n+1=\frac{n^2-1}{n-1}$$

Multiply through by $n-1$:

$$(n+1)(n-1)=n^2-1$$

So, given that this is an identity, you original equation is as well, with the additional restriction $n\ne1$. :)
 
Alternatively,

$$ \left( n^4 - n^2 \right) \left( \frac{n}{n - 1} \right), \, n \gt 0, \, n \ne 1 $$

$$ = \frac{ n^5 - n^3 }{ n - 1 } $$

$$ = \frac{ n^3(n^2 - 1) }{ n - 1 } $$

$$ = \frac{ n^3(n + 1)(n - 1) }{ n - 1} $$

$$ = n^3(n + 1) $$

$$ = n^4 + n^3 $$
 
Angel1 said:
[math]n^{5}+n^{4}=(n^{5}-n^{3})*(n-1)-(n-2)[/math]
I suspect that it is supposed to be
[math]n^5 + n^4 = (n^5 - n^3) \left ( \frac{n - 1}{n - 2} \right )[/math]

similar to the other one. However now we have no solutions for n, integer or otherwise.

-Dan

- - - Updated - - -

greg1313 said:
Hint: $ 3 \cdot 37 = 111 $
Okay I'm officially clueless, a state which I have a lot of experience in. How is this a hint?

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
Okay I'm officially clueless, a state which I have a lot of experience in. How is this a hint?

-Dan
The original question was ":"WHY does this happen (i mean it goes a little bit into philosophical thinking rather than logical but i would like an explanation like why and 3 digit number that has the same number in every digit if you add it together and multiply the result by 37 it becomes the same number)."
For example, if we add the digits in 555 we get 15 and 555/37= 15. If we add the digits in 888 we get 24 and 888/37= 24.

That is, "why, if we have something like aaa, where "a" is a single digit, if you add them, you get "3a", while if you divide by 37, you also get "3a"". And greg1313's response was that aaa= a(111)= a(3)(37).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top