Pozitron-Electron interaction(anihilation)

  • Thread starter Thread starter pop_ianosd
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the conservation of energy in the context of positron-electron annihilation, specifically when a positron with kinetic energy T approaches an electron bound to a nucleus. The initial equation proposed by one participant is 2m0c2 + T = 2ε + Ek, while another argues for 2m0c2 + T + Ek = 2ε. The key point of contention is whether the ionization energy Ek should be added or subtracted in the conservation equation, with implications for energy conservation principles. The correct interpretation hinges on understanding the role of binding energy in the system.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conservation of energy principles in particle physics
  • Familiarity with positron-electron interactions and annihilation processes
  • Knowledge of ionization energy concepts, particularly in atomic physics
  • Basic grasp of relativistic energy equations, including rest mass energy
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of conservation of energy in particle interactions
  • Explore positronium formation and its implications in annihilation events
  • Learn about ionization energy and its role in atomic transitions
  • Investigate relativistic energy-momentum relationships in particle physics
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in particle physics, particularly those studying annihilation processes, energy conservation, and atomic interactions. This discussion is also beneficial for educators teaching advanced physics concepts.

pop_ianosd
Messages
12
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


A given pozitron with T kinetic energy is approaching an electron bound to a hard nucleus(in the K energy level, and the ionization energy for this level, Ek(>0), is given).
The energy of the two resulting photons is to be determined.

Homework Equations


Conservation of energy.

The Attempt at a Solution


So I wrote the conservation of energy as follows:
2m0c2 + T = 2ε + Ek ( ε is the energy of one photon )
Let me explain my way of thinking: After the anihilation, the electron has vanished, so the atom has become a ion(so it's energy has increased by Ek).

However, the proposers of the problem consider the conservation of energy as follows:
2m0c2 + T + Ek = 2ε;

So who is right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If Ek is defined to be positive, it should be subtracted on the left side (or added on the right side).
Otherwise you can violate energy conservation: Take a free electron, let it get caught by a nucleus (emitting energy). Add a free positron, and get more than 2*511keV as energy => you gained the binding energy two times.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K