Precentral Gyrus Stimulation and Voluntary movement

  • Context: Medical 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ragarth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Movement
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effects of electrical stimulation of the precentral gyrus on voluntary movement, particularly whether patients perceive these movements as voluntary or reflexive. The scope includes theoretical interpretations and references to experimental evidence.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Debate/contested, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the interpretation of movements induced by electrical stimulation of the precentral gyrus, suggesting that patients may perceive these movements as voluntary.
  • Another participant cites an experiment where subjects reported the movements as reflexive rather than voluntary, indicating variability in perception based on experimental conditions.
  • A third participant expresses skepticism about the reliability of the source material, noting previous misleading statements in the book.
  • A later reply acknowledges the validity of the second participant's points, suggesting a general agreement among some regarding the interpretation of the findings.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the movements are perceived as voluntary or reflexive, indicating that multiple competing interpretations remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights potential limitations in the interpretation of experimental results and the influence of context on patient perception, but does not resolve these issues.

ragarth
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hiya, I'm currently reading The Encyclopaedia Britannica Guide to the Brain and I came across a statement about the precentral gyrus that I'd like to find corroboration for:

"When parts of the gyrus are electrically stimulated in conscious patients (under local anaesthesia), they produce localized movements on the opposite side of the body that are interpreted by the patient as voluntary"

When I read this, it makes me think that, if asked, the patient would state they are consciously making the movement generated by the electrical stimulus. Is this correct, and does anyone know of an experiment where this has been verified?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
The case where I've seen the experiment performed (it was a popular science quiz t.v. show) the subjects did not think it was voluntary, but more like a reflex such as when you get hit by a hammer on the knee (but I can imagine that the circumstances in which the experiment is performed can greatly influence the experience of the subject).
 
Humm, how should I interpret that statement then? I'm rapidly losing trust in this book, this would make the 2nd statement in under 30 pages that is either factually false or stupendously misleading.
 
You made some good points there. I did a search on the topic and found most people will agree with your post.
 

Similar threads

Medical Deep brain stimulation good for Parkinson's: study
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Modern interpretation of Libet data
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K
Medical Is the Future of Medicine Already Here?
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Medical Can deep-brain stimulation reverse memory loss?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Medical Treating Depression with Deep Brain Stimulation
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Cancer drugs and Alzheimer's, Oh my
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
Medical The Human Mind and Predicting Behavior
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
Key papers in computational neuroscience
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
12K
What Makes the Mind of Man More Than Just Brain Chemistry?
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
7K
Graduate Wellcome to the desert of the real
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K