Prep for Algebra Comprehensive Exam #4

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter BSMSMSTMSPHD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra Exam
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on determining the minimal polynomial of the element \( \sqrt{3} + \sqrt{7} \) over \( \mathbb{Q} \), identifying the Galois group of this polynomial, and exploring the subfields of its splitting field. The scope includes theoretical aspects of field extensions and polynomial irreducibility.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that the splitting field must include \( \sqrt{3} \) and \( \sqrt{7} \), leading to the conclusion that the smallest field extension containing both is \( \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{3}, \sqrt{7}) \), with a degree of 4.
  • Another participant asserts that showing irreducibility of the polynomial is not necessary if a polynomial for the splitting field is found.
  • A participant mentions a general result regarding the Galois group structure for square-free coprime integers, which aligns with the earlier findings.
  • One participant suggests an alternative approach to find the minimal polynomial by eliminating radicals from a polynomial expression involving \( \sqrt{3} + \sqrt{7} \).
  • Several participants engage in a discussion about the necessity of reasoning to show that \( \sqrt{3} \) and \( \sqrt{7} \) are included in the splitting field.
  • Field operations are discussed as a method to demonstrate the inclusion of \( \sqrt{3} \) and \( \sqrt{7} \) in the splitting field, with various attempts to isolate square roots.
  • One participant successfully shows that \( \sqrt{7} \) is in the splitting field through algebraic manipulation, while another confirms that this implies the order of the extension is 4.
  • Further clarification is provided regarding the degrees of the extensions and the minimal polynomials for \( \sqrt{3} \) and \( \sqrt{7} \).

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the degree of the extension and the structure of the Galois group, but there is some contention regarding the necessity of showing irreducibility and the reasoning behind the inclusion of square roots in the splitting field.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the steps required to demonstrate that \( \sqrt{3} \) and \( \sqrt{7} \) are in the splitting field, indicating that further clarification on field operations may be needed.

BSMSMSTMSPHD
Messages
131
Reaction score
0
Determine the minimal polynomial [tex]f(x)[/tex] over [tex]\mathbb{Q}[/tex] of the element [tex]\sqrt3 + \sqrt7[/tex]. Determine the Galois group of [tex]f(x)[/tex] and all the subfields of the splitting field of [tex]f(x)[/tex].

SOLUTION

This one seems pretty straightforward, I just need checks on my reasoning. I apologize in advance for any redundancies. Your comments are welcome.

The splitting field must include [tex]\sqrt3 + \sqrt7[/tex] so specifically, it must contain [tex]\sqrt3[/tex] and [tex]\sqrt7[/tex]. The smallest field extension of [tex]\mathbb{Q}[/tex] that contains [tex]\sqrt3[/tex] is [tex]\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt3)[/tex] and likewise, the smallest field extension of [tex]\mathbb{Q}[/tex] that contains [tex]\sqrt7[/tex] is [tex]\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt7)[/tex]. But, since neither root is contained in the other's extension, neither of these can be the splitting field.

The smallest field extension of [tex]\mathbb{Q}[/tex] that contains [tex]\sqrt3[/tex] and [tex]\sqrt7[/tex] is [tex]\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt3, \sqrt7)[/tex]. It follows from the above argument that the degree of this extension is 4.

(Again, I realize this may be superfluous... I'm just contrasting this type of problem to, say, a similar one with the element [tex]\sqrt3 + \sqrt[6]3[/tex] which would have degree 6, and the above argument would be different)

So, we're looking for a minimal polynomial of degree 4. Since the polynomial is in [tex]\mathbb{Q}[/tex] the other 3 roots must be the distinct conjugates of [tex]\sqrt3 + \sqrt7[/tex], which are [tex]\pm \sqrt3 \pm \sqrt7[/tex]. Thus, the minimal polynomial is:

[tex](x - (\sqrt3 + \sqrt7))(x - (\sqrt3 - \sqrt7))(x - (- \sqrt3 + \sqrt7))(x - (- \sqrt3 - \sqrt7)) = x^4 - 20x^2 + 16[/tex]

Do I need to show irreducibility here? If so, by Gauss's Lemma, taking mod 7, and using Eisenstein (p = 2), we have it to be so.

From this, we know that the order of the Galois group is also 4, which is obvious, since any automorphism is completely determined by its action on [tex]\sqrt3[/tex] and [tex]\sqrt7[/tex], each of which can either be left alone (identity automorphism) or sent to their additive inverse (conjugate automorphism).

Let [tex]\sigma[/tex] be the conjugate automorphism on [tex]\sqrt3[/tex] and let [tex]\tau[/tex] be the conjugate automorphism on [tex]\sqrt7[/tex]. Then, [tex]\{ 1, \sigma, \tau, \sigma\tau \}[/tex] is the Galois group. Since each element has order 2, this group is isomorphic to [tex]\mathbb{Z} _2 \times \mathbb{Z} _2[/tex] which has 3 subgroups of order 2.

Therefore, the splitting field [tex]\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt3, \sqrt7)[/tex] must have three subfields of index 2 (yes?) which are [tex]\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt3)[/tex] , [tex]\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt7)[/tex] and [tex]\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt21)[/tex] which all contain the subfield [tex]\mathbb{Q}[/tex].
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As I said last time, splitting fields do not have anything to do with irreducible polynomials. If you can find an polynomial(s) for the splitting field you do not need to show they are irreducible.


Here is a nice result to know.
If [tex]p_1,p_2,...,p_n[/tex] are square-free and coprime:
[tex]\mbox{Gal}(\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{p_1},...,\sqrt{p_n})/\mathbb{Q})\simeq \mathbb{Z}_2\times ... \times \mathbb{Z}_2[/tex]
Where the product is taken [tex]n[/tex] times.

This confirms with your result.
 
Last edited:
Thanks Kummer - I had a feeling about that general result.

Also, just playing around a minute ago, I realized that once I knew the degree of the minimal polynomial was 4, I could just write [tex](\sqrt3 + \sqrt7)^4 + a(\sqrt3 + \sqrt7)^3 + b(\sqrt3 + \sqrt7)^2 + c(\sqrt3 + \sqrt7) + d = 0[/tex] and then eliminate all of the radicals to find the values of [tex]a, b, c, d[/tex]. This isn't necessarily easier to do, but it makes more sense to me, and I was able to do it similarly for a different problem.
 
BSMSMSTMSPHD said:
The splitting field must include [tex]\sqrt3 + \sqrt7[/tex] so specifically, it must contain [tex]\sqrt3[/tex] and [tex]\sqrt7[/tex].

Isn't more reasoning needed for that?
 
yes showing that is the main point.
 
Well, [tex]\mathbb{Q}( \sqrt2 + \sqrt3)[/tex] is a subfield of [tex]\mathbb{Q}( \sqrt2 , \sqrt3)[/tex], but I'm not sure how to start... :confused:
 
you have to perform various field operations on the sum and try to isolate one of the square roots. i would of course begin by squaring the sum and see what happens.
 
well that didnt give much so maybe then cube it.
 
The square of the sum is [tex]5 + 2 \sqrt6[/tex]

This value is in [tex]\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt6)[/tex]...
 
  • #10
mathwonk said:
well that didnt give much so maybe then cube it.

Okay, [tex]11 \sqrt2 + 9 \sqrt3[/tex]
 
  • #11
Theorem: For [tex]n,m\in \mathbb{Z}[/tex] we have [tex]\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{n},\sqrt{m})=\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{n}+\sqrt{m})[/tex].
 
Last edited:
  • #12
now subtract 9sqrt(7) + 9sqrt(3) from that.

but correct it first.
 
  • #13
Yeah, for some reason I used [tex]\sqrt2[/tex] instead of [tex]\sqrt7[/tex]. Not sure why...

[tex]( \sqrt3 + \sqrt7 )^3 = 24 \sqrt3 + 16 \sqrt7[/tex] which, when I subtract what you have gives me [tex]15 \sqrt3 + 7 \sqrt7[/tex]. I still have no idea what I'm trying to show here.
 
  • #14
You want to show that [itex]\sqrt3[/itex] and [itex]\sqrt7[/itex] are in the splitting field by using the field operations on [itex]\sqrt3 + \sqrt7[/itex].

Subtract [itex]16\sqrt3 + 16\sqrt7[/itex] from what you got up there. We know that this must be in the field.

Another way would be to find [itex]\left(\sqrt3 + \sqrt7\right)^{-1} = 1/\left(\sqrt3 + \sqrt7\right)[/itex]. Then maybe add this or subtract it from [itex]\sqrt3 + \sqrt7[/itex].
 
Last edited:
  • #15
[tex]\frac{1}{\sqrt3 + \sqrt7} = \frac{\sqrt7 - \sqrt3}{4}[/tex]

So, if I do [tex](\sqrt3 + \sqrt7) + 4(\sqrt3 + \sqrt7)^{-1} = 2\sqrt7[/tex] that shows that [tex]\sqrt7[/tex] is in the splitting field?
 
Last edited:
  • #16
It should be [itex]-\sqrt3[/itex] up there, but yes, that shows that [itex]\sqrt7[/itex] is in the splitting field. Do you understand why?

By the way, if you used mathwonk's hint, you'd have got that [itex]8\sqrt3[/itex], and hence [itex]\sqrt3[/itex], are in the splitting field.
 
  • #17
Yep, I made the fix. I do understand why this shows that the splitting field for [tex]\sqrt3 + \sqrt7[/tex] includes the elements [tex]\sqrt3[/tex] and [tex]\sqrt7[/tex]. Does this lead to the conclusion that the order of the extension is 4?
 
  • #18
Yes, as long as you know that [itex]\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt3, \sqrt7)[/itex] is a degree 4 extension of [itex]\mathbb{Q}[/itex]. :wink:
 
  • #19
Which it is because [tex]\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt3, \sqrt7)[/tex] is degree 2 over [tex]\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt7)[/tex] which is degree 2 over [tex]\mathbb{Q}[/tex]. The minimal polynomials are [tex]x^2-3[/tex] and [tex]x^2-7[/tex] respectively.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K