Prerequisites for studying Quarks and Leptons (Halzen and Martin)

AI Thread Summary
Studying Griffiths' "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" provides a solid foundation for tackling Halzen and Martin's "Quarks and Leptons." The preface of Halzen and Martin confirms that a basic understanding of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics and special relativity is adequate for starting the book. Therefore, the knowledge gained from Griffiths should be sufficient. Additionally, for those seeking a more modern and accessible approach, Griffiths' second edition of "Introduction to Elementary Particles" is recommended as it offers a slightly lower level of complexity while covering similar topics.
nick25
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
I study physics on my own and just ended up Griffiths' book on Quantum Mechanics. Is this level of QM enough to be able to study Halzen and Martin's Quarks and Leptons book on particle physics? I planned on studying it while studying Sakurai QM, but I just wanted to be sure that I could at least get started with some basic QM knowledge (I also assummed no other particle physics knowledge was necessary). Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nick25 said:
I study physics on my own and just ended up Griffiths' book on Quantum Mechanics. Is this level of QM enough to be able to study Halzen and Martin's Quarks and Leptons book on particle physics?

The Preface of Halzen and Martin states "The primary purpose of this book is to introduce these ideas in the simplest possible way. We assume only a basic knowledge of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics and the theory of special relativity." Taken at face value, this seems to indicate that "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (and basic special relativity) should be sufficient.

More modern than Hazen and Martin, and at slightly lower level, is the second edition of the book "Introduction to Elementary Particles" by Griffiths (and also other recent books).
 
  • Like
Likes nick25, Demystifier, Astronuc and 3 others
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
I’ve heard that in some countries (for example, Argentina), the curriculum is structured differently from the typical American program. In the U.S., students usually take a general physics course first, then move on to a textbook like Griffiths, and only encounter Jackson at the graduate level. In contrast, in those countries students go through a general physics course (such as Resnick-Halliday) and then proceed directly to Jackson. If the slower, more gradual approach is considered...

Similar threads

Back
Top