Prerequisites for studying Quarks and Leptons (Halzen and Martin)

AI Thread Summary
Studying Griffiths' "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" provides a solid foundation for tackling Halzen and Martin's "Quarks and Leptons." The preface of Halzen and Martin confirms that a basic understanding of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics and special relativity is adequate for starting the book. Therefore, the knowledge gained from Griffiths should be sufficient. Additionally, for those seeking a more modern and accessible approach, Griffiths' second edition of "Introduction to Elementary Particles" is recommended as it offers a slightly lower level of complexity while covering similar topics.
nick25
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
I study physics on my own and just ended up Griffiths' book on Quantum Mechanics. Is this level of QM enough to be able to study Halzen and Martin's Quarks and Leptons book on particle physics? I planned on studying it while studying Sakurai QM, but I just wanted to be sure that I could at least get started with some basic QM knowledge (I also assummed no other particle physics knowledge was necessary). Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nick25 said:
I study physics on my own and just ended up Griffiths' book on Quantum Mechanics. Is this level of QM enough to be able to study Halzen and Martin's Quarks and Leptons book on particle physics?

The Preface of Halzen and Martin states "The primary purpose of this book is to introduce these ideas in the simplest possible way. We assume only a basic knowledge of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics and the theory of special relativity." Taken at face value, this seems to indicate that "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (and basic special relativity) should be sufficient.

More modern than Hazen and Martin, and at slightly lower level, is the second edition of the book "Introduction to Elementary Particles" by Griffiths (and also other recent books).
 
  • Like
Likes nick25, Demystifier, Astronuc and 3 others
TLDR: is Blennow "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering" a good follow-up to Altland "Mathematics for physicists"? Hello everybody, returning to physics after 30-something years, I felt the need to brush up my maths first. It took me 6 months and I'm currently more than half way through the Altland "Mathematics for physicists" book, covering the math for undergraduate studies at the right level of sophystication, most of which I howewer already knew (being an aerospace engineer)...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Back
Top