Prerequisites for studying Quarks and Leptons (Halzen and Martin)

Click For Summary
Studying Griffiths' "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" provides a solid foundation for tackling Halzen and Martin's "Quarks and Leptons." The preface of Halzen and Martin confirms that a basic understanding of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics and special relativity is adequate for starting the book. Therefore, the knowledge gained from Griffiths should be sufficient. Additionally, for those seeking a more modern and accessible approach, Griffiths' second edition of "Introduction to Elementary Particles" is recommended as it offers a slightly lower level of complexity while covering similar topics.
nick25
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
I study physics on my own and just ended up Griffiths' book on Quantum Mechanics. Is this level of QM enough to be able to study Halzen and Martin's Quarks and Leptons book on particle physics? I planned on studying it while studying Sakurai QM, but I just wanted to be sure that I could at least get started with some basic QM knowledge (I also assummed no other particle physics knowledge was necessary). Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nick25 said:
I study physics on my own and just ended up Griffiths' book on Quantum Mechanics. Is this level of QM enough to be able to study Halzen and Martin's Quarks and Leptons book on particle physics?

The Preface of Halzen and Martin states "The primary purpose of this book is to introduce these ideas in the simplest possible way. We assume only a basic knowledge of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics and the theory of special relativity." Taken at face value, this seems to indicate that "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (and basic special relativity) should be sufficient.

More modern than Hazen and Martin, and at slightly lower level, is the second edition of the book "Introduction to Elementary Particles" by Griffiths (and also other recent books).
 
  • Like
Likes nick25, Demystifier, Astronuc and 3 others
Im currently reading mathematics for physicists by Philippe Dennery and André Krzywicki, and I’m understanding most concepts however I think it would be better for me to get a book on complex analysis or calculus to better understand it so I’m not left looking at an equation for an hour trying to figure out what it means. So here comes the split, do I get a complex analysis book? Or a calculus book? I might be able to Borrow a calculus textbook from my math teacher study that for a bit and...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
560
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K