Prerequisites for studying Quarks and Leptons (Halzen and Martin)

Click For Summary
Studying Griffiths' "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" provides a solid foundation for tackling Halzen and Martin's "Quarks and Leptons." The preface of Halzen and Martin confirms that a basic understanding of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics and special relativity is adequate for starting the book. Therefore, the knowledge gained from Griffiths should be sufficient. Additionally, for those seeking a more modern and accessible approach, Griffiths' second edition of "Introduction to Elementary Particles" is recommended as it offers a slightly lower level of complexity while covering similar topics.
nick25
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
I study physics on my own and just ended up Griffiths' book on Quantum Mechanics. Is this level of QM enough to be able to study Halzen and Martin's Quarks and Leptons book on particle physics? I planned on studying it while studying Sakurai QM, but I just wanted to be sure that I could at least get started with some basic QM knowledge (I also assummed no other particle physics knowledge was necessary). Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nick25 said:
I study physics on my own and just ended up Griffiths' book on Quantum Mechanics. Is this level of QM enough to be able to study Halzen and Martin's Quarks and Leptons book on particle physics?

The Preface of Halzen and Martin states "The primary purpose of this book is to introduce these ideas in the simplest possible way. We assume only a basic knowledge of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics and the theory of special relativity." Taken at face value, this seems to indicate that "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (and basic special relativity) should be sufficient.

More modern than Hazen and Martin, and at slightly lower level, is the second edition of the book "Introduction to Elementary Particles" by Griffiths (and also other recent books).
 
  • Like
Likes nick25, Demystifier, Astronuc and 3 others
Many years ago, as the internet was coming of age, I burned over 500 pounds of technical manuals. I realized I can look things up on the internet faster than I can find something in a technical manual. And just about anything I might need could be found online. But letting go of my several shelves worth of college text and other science books is another matter. I can't bring myself to get rid of them but there is very little if anything I can't find online now. Books are heavy and a pain...

Similar threads