Pressure at a certain depth when density varies

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating pressure at a certain depth when density varies, using the equations dp/dz = -ρg and p = ρgh. A participant calculated the density at 3m depth as 1060 kg/m³ but found their pressure result of 31195.8 Pa to be slightly off. The conversation emphasizes the need to sum pressure contributions from thin layers stacked from the surface to the desired depth, suggesting the use of integration. It is noted that the integration variable must be correctly related to depth, and attention should be paid to the direction of integration to ensure proper sign usage. The participants clarify the mathematical approach needed to accurately solve the problem.
pressurised
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


59fyFj4.png


Homework Equations


dp/dz=-ρg
p=ρgh

The Attempt at a Solution


I've found the density at depth 3m using ρ=ρ0+kh, which gave me 1060kgm-3. I then put this value into ρgh to get 31195.8Pa which seems to be ≈+1000 off the answer.

What is the correct mathematical way of solving this as I am not quite sure how to form the equation for variation of pressure using that.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think of summing the pressure contributions from thin layers stacked one on top of the next from the surface down to the desired depth. Does that remind you of anything?
 
gneill said:
Think of summing the pressure contributions from thin layers stacked one on top of the next from the surface down to the desired depth. Does that remind you of anything?

I can't quite think of the name of it but I understand what you mean:sorry:.

I would have thought ∫-(ρ0+kh)g dz would have been okay to use?
 
pressurised said:
I would have thought ∫-(ρ0+kh)g dz would have been okay to use?
That's the idea. You'll need to relate the h to your integration variable z. You should pay attention to the "direction" that your integration path takes as it affects the sign of the dz differential element and hence whether that leading minus sign is warranted.
 
  • Like
Likes Chestermiller
gneill said:
That's the idea. You'll need to relate the h to your integration variable z. You should pay attention to the "direction" that your integration path takes as it affects the sign of the dz differential element and hence whether that leading minus sign is warranted.

Thank you!
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K