Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
- 3,920
- 48
I am studying Dummit and Foote Section 15.2. I am trying to understand the proof of Proposition 19 Part (5) on page 682 (see attachment)
Proposition 19 Part (5) reads as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposition 19.
... ...
(5) Suppose M is a maximal ideal and Q is an ideal with [tex]M^n \subseteq Q \subseteq M[/tex] for some [tex]n \ge 1[/tex].
Then Q is a primary idea, with rad Q = M
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The proof of (5) above reads as follows:-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proof.
Suppose [tex]M^n \subseteq Q \subseteq M[/tex] for some [tex]n \ge 1[/tex] where M is a maximal idea.
Then [tex]Q \subseteq M[/tex] so [tex]rad \ Q \subseteq rad \ M = M[/tex].
... ... etc
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My problem is as follows:
Why can we be sure that rad M = M?
I know that M is maximal and so no ideal in R can contain M. We also know that [tex]M \subseteq rad \ M[/tex]
Thus either rad M = M (the conclusion D&F use) or rad M = R?
How do we know that [tex]rad \ M \ne R[/tex]?
Would appreciate some help.
Peter
Proposition 19 Part (5) reads as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposition 19.
... ...
(5) Suppose M is a maximal ideal and Q is an ideal with [tex]M^n \subseteq Q \subseteq M[/tex] for some [tex]n \ge 1[/tex].
Then Q is a primary idea, with rad Q = M
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The proof of (5) above reads as follows:-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proof.
Suppose [tex]M^n \subseteq Q \subseteq M[/tex] for some [tex]n \ge 1[/tex] where M is a maximal idea.
Then [tex]Q \subseteq M[/tex] so [tex]rad \ Q \subseteq rad \ M = M[/tex].
... ... etc
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My problem is as follows:
Why can we be sure that rad M = M?
I know that M is maximal and so no ideal in R can contain M. We also know that [tex]M \subseteq rad \ M[/tex]
Thus either rad M = M (the conclusion D&F use) or rad M = R?
How do we know that [tex]rad \ M \ne R[/tex]?
Would appreciate some help.
Peter
Last edited: