Prime factorization of rationals

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the unique prime factorization of rational numbers (Q) when negative exponents are permitted. It establishes that any rational number expressed as a fraction a/b can be represented uniquely as a product of prime factors, with exponents derived from the prime factorizations of a and b. The conversation highlights the connection to non-archimedean norms and p-adic analysis, while also clarifying that the term "prime factorization" is not applicable due to the presence of units in the rational numbers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of prime factorization in integers
  • Familiarity with rational numbers and their properties
  • Basic knowledge of algebraic structures such as rings and fields
  • Introduction to non-archimedean norms and p-adic analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of non-archimedean norms in detail
  • Explore p-adic analysis and its applications
  • Learn about the properties of units in algebraic structures
  • Investigate the implications of unique factorization in various mathematical contexts
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, number theorists, and students interested in advanced algebraic concepts, particularly those exploring the properties of rational numbers and their factorizations.

dodo
Messages
695
Reaction score
2
It occurred to me that the rationals Q have also a unique prime factorization, as long as you allow negative exponents on the factorization.

If a/b is a rational, then both a and b have a unique (integer) prime factorization, and the fraction can be expressed uniquely as a product of primes, raised to the difference of the exponents found in the respective prime factors of a and b. Note that a/b does not even need to be reduced for this to work.

I find this a beautiful idea, but I ignore how to use it further, or what else can be constructed using it.

Edit: oops, except for zero... bye-bye to groups, rings, fields...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Good news: this idea is useful. What you've done is come very close to discovering non-archimedian norms, which leads to the study of p-adic anlysis.

Bad news: you can't call it prime factorisation, since everything is a unit.
 
Thanks, Matt. What do you mean, everything is a unit?
 
Dodo said:
Thanks, Matt. What do you mean, everything is a unit?

Evey nonzero rational has a reciprocal that is a nonzero rational. In general, a 'unit' is a member of a ring which has a multiplicative inverse in the ring.
 
And (unique) prime factorisations, when they exist, are only ever defined 'up to units'. It is just about not mixing and matching your definitions, that's all.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
928
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K