Prime Ideals of direct sum of Z and Z

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter joeblow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Direct sum Prime Sum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on identifying nonzero prime ideals of the direct sum of integers, specifically \(\mathbb{Z} \oplus \mathbb{Z}\). It is established that direct sums of prime ideals do not yield prime ideals, as demonstrated with the example of \(2\mathbb{Z} \oplus 3\mathbb{Z}\). The prime ideals of \(\mathbb{Z} \oplus \mathbb{Z}\) are shown to be of the form \(p\mathbb{Z} \oplus \mathbb{Z}\), where \(p\) is a prime number, but these ideals are also maximal, leading to the conclusion that there are no non-maximal prime ideals in this structure.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of prime ideals in ring theory
  • Familiarity with direct sums of rings
  • Knowledge of the structure of \(\mathbb{Z}\) and its ideals
  • Basic concepts of fields and domains in abstract algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of prime ideals in direct sums of rings
  • Study the relationship between prime and maximal ideals in ring theory
  • Explore the implications of modding out by prime ideals in \(\mathbb{Z}\)
  • Investigate examples of non-maximal prime ideals in other ring structures
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebraists, and students studying abstract algebra, particularly those interested in ring theory and the properties of ideals.

joeblow
Messages
71
Reaction score
0
I am trying to find nonzero prime ideals of \mathbb{Z} \oplus \mathbb {Z}, specifically those which are not also maximal.

If I try to do direct sums of prime ideals, the resulting set is not a prime ideal. (e.g., 2 \mathbb{Z} \oplus 3 \mathbb{Z} is not prime since (3,3) \cdot (2,2) = (6,6)\in 2 \mathbb{Z} \oplus 3 \mathbb{Z}, but (2,2),(3,3) \notin 2 \mathbb{Z} \oplus 3\mathbb{Z}.)

In fact, I don't think a prime ideal could be constructed in this way since I can always take a product of the form (1,x)(y,1) and obtain (y,x) and since 1 isn't a multiple of any integer other than 1, neither of the factors would have come from the ideal.

Can somebody please help me find the prime ideals? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
modding out a prime ideal is supposed to give a domain. does that help?

notice the zero ideal is not prime, why not?
 
0 is not prime because (a,0)(0,b)=0, but (a,0),(0,b)\notin 0.

Okay, so would \langle (2,3) \rangle be a prime ideal and \langle (4,6) \rangle be a prime ideal that is not maximal?

If you mod out by both, I believe you get an ID, but \langle (4,6) \rangle \subset \langle (2,3) \rangle .
 
We have

(2,5)*(5,3)\in <(2,3)>

but neither (2,5), not (5,3) is in the ideal.

What about (\alpha\mathbb{Z})\times \mathbb{Z}
 
Okay, then p \mathbb{Z} \oplus \mathbb{Z} is a prime ideal if p is prime, but it would also be maximal... or would it? If I mod out by it, I think I get a field, so it would have to be maximal.

If we have I= rs \mathbb{Z} \oplus \mathbb{Z}, then I can always write (r,1)\cdot (s,1)=(rs,1)\in I, but (r,1),(s,1)\notin I. Thus, composites don't work.
 
Okay, I have proven that for any rings R and S, R \oplus S can only have a prime ideal of the form I \oplus S where I is a prime ideal of R or R \oplus J where J is a prime ideal of S. Since the prime ideals of Z are pZ for prime p, the prime ideals of \mathbb{Z}\oplus \mathbb{Z} are p \mathbb{Z} \oplus \mathbb{Z}.

BUT, we have (\mathbb{Z} \oplus \mathbb{Z})/(p \mathbb{Z} \oplus \mathbb{Z})\cong (\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z}) \oplus (\mathbb{Z}/\mathbb{Z})\cong \mathbb{Z}/p \mathbb{Z} which is a field.

Either I'm missing something simple, or there are no primes that are not also maximal.
 
Don't forget \mathbb Z \oplus p\mathbb Z and the two nonmaximal primes 0 \oplus \mathbb Z and \mathbb Z \oplus 0.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
988
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
10K