MHB Principal Ideal Domains .... ....

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    domains
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the proof of Lemma 7.2.13 from "The Basics of Abstract Algebra" by Paul E. Bland, specifically regarding Principal Ideal Domains (PIDs). The lemma states that if two ideals generated by elements a and b are equal, then a and b are associates in an integral domain. The proof involves showing that if (a) = (b), then both elements can be expressed in terms of each other using units, leading to the conclusion that they are associates. A similar argument is presented for the converse, confirming the equality of the ideals. The exchange highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between ideals and their generators in abstract algebra.
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading The Basics of Abstract Algebra by Paul E. Bland ...

I am focused on Section 7.2 Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains, Unique Factorization Domains ... ...

I need help with the proof of Lemma 7.2.13 ... ... Lemma 7.2.13 reads as follows:https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/8255Bland states Lemma 7.2.13 but does not prove it ... can someone please demonstrate a proof ...Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Peter,

If $(a)=(b)$ then $a\in(b)$ and $a=rb$ from some $r\in D$; a similar argument shows that $b=sa$ for some $s\in D$.
We have therefore $a = rb = (rs)a$ and $a(rs-1)=0$. As we are in an integral domain, this implies $rs=1$, which means that $r$ and $s$ are units and $a$ and $b$ are associates.

Conversely, if $a=rb$, we have $a\in(b)$ and $(a)\subset(b)$; a similar argument shows that $(b)\subset(a)$, and therefore $(a)=(b)$.
 
castor28 said:
Hi Peter,

If $(a)=(b)$ then $a\in(b)$ and $a=rb$ from some $r\in D$; a similar argument shows that $b=sa$ for some $s\in D$.
We have therefore $a = rb = (rs)a$ and $a(rs-1)=0$. As we are in an integral domain, this implies $rs=1$, which means that $r$ and $s$ are units and $a$ and $b$ are associates.

Conversely, if $a=rb$, we have $a\in(b)$ and $(a)\subset(b)$; a similar argument shows that $(b)\subset(a)$, and therefore $(a)=(b)$.
Thanks castor28 ... appreciate your help ...

Peter
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K