MHB Principal Ideal Rings and GCDs .... .... Bland Proposition 4.3.3

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rings
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Paul E. Bland's book, "Rings and Their Modules".

I am focused on Section 4.3: Modules Over Principal Ideal Domains ... and I need some help to fully understand the proof of part of Proposition 4.3.3 ... ...

Proposition 4.3.3 reads as follows:View attachment 8247
View attachment 8248
In the above proof by Bland we read the following:

"... ... If $$(d) = a_1 R + a_2 R + \ ... \ ... \ + a_n R$$, then each $$a_i$$ is in $$(d)$$ ... ... "Can someone please explain how $$(d) = a_1 R + a_2 R + \ ... \ ... \ + a_n R$$ implies each $$a_i$$ is in $$(d)$$ ... ..Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Peter,
$$a_1 = a_1\cdot 1 + a_2 \cdot 0 + \cdots + a_n \cdot 0 \in (d)$$ and similarly for the other $a_i$.
 
Thread 'Derivation of equations of stress tensor transformation'
Hello ! I derived equations of stress tensor 2D transformation. Some details: I have plane ABCD in two cases (see top on the pic) and I know tensor components for case 1 only. Only plane ABCD rotate in two cases (top of the picture) but not coordinate system. Coordinate system rotates only on the bottom of picture. I want to obtain expression that connects tensor for case 1 and tensor for case 2. My attempt: Are these equations correct? Is there more easier expression for stress tensor...
Back
Top