# Principal nth Root of a Real Number

Staff Emeritus
Gold Member
According to Wikipedia, if n is odd, then every real number A has a unique real nth root having the same sign as A and known as the principal nth root of A. It is denoted by

$$\sqrt[n]{A}$$

My question is, how do we know that this is true i.e. that $\sqrt[n]{A}$ exists for all real numbers if n is odd, and for all positive real numbers if n is even?

Note: I have studied Complex Analysis. I am not interested in the other n-1 complex roots of the number.

Staff Emeritus
Gold Member

Let y be a negative real number:

$$y = A e^{i(\pi + 2k\pi)}, \ \ \ \ \ k \in \mathbb{Z}$$

Then

$$y^{1/n} = \sqrt[n]{A} e^{i(\pi/n + 2k\pi/n)}, \ \ \ \ \ k \in \{0,...,n-1\}$$

We can prove that one of the roots must be real by equating the argument to pi so that we just get a negative real number. Solving for k, we get:

k = (n-1)/2

which is an integer in the allowable range of k values IF n is odd.

Conclusion: $\sqrt[n]{y}$ exists and is equal to -$\sqrt[n]{A}$ where A = |y| (provided n is odd)

So my question reduces to, "how do we know that every POSITIVE real number has a unique, real nth root?"

How about using the infimum axiom the superimum axiom and the squeeze theorem.

morphism
Homework Helper
x^n is a continuous bijection on the appropriate domain and codomain.

Staff Emeritus
Gold Member
How about using the infimum axiom the superimum axiom and the squeeze theorem.
I'm not familiar with those axioms. I haven't been taught any number theory formally (if that is indeed what this is), so maybe I won't be able to understand the answer to this question.

Staff Emeritus
Gold Member
x^n is a continuous bijection on the appropriate domain and codomain.
Haha...ironically, I have a problem asking me to determine whether f(x) = x^3 + 1 is a bijection, given a domain of R and a codomain of R, and THAT problem is what raised this question in my mind in the first place! I have no doubt that if the claim I was asking about is true, then it follows that what you have said is true, and vice versa. I just have no idea how to go about proving either statement.

Hurkyl
Staff Emeritus
Gold Member
I'm not familiar with those axioms. I haven't been taught any number theory formally (if that is indeed what this is), so maybe I won't be able to understand the answer to this question.
This real analysis; in fact, all you need is calc I. You said you took complex analysis -- well, you could use that too, can't you?

Last edited:
I'm not familiar with those axioms. I haven't been taught any number theory formally (if that is indeed what this is), so maybe I won't be able to understand the answer to this question.
The axioms are necessary for the existence of the real numbers.

morphism