- 4,662
- 372
i read i think in russell's "problems in philosophy" that his book (that he wrote with witehead) were read by a handful of people, i wonder if anyone here read this mass, and is it availabale in the web?
The discussion revolves around the availability and readability of "Principia Mathematica," co-authored by Bertrand Russell and Alfred North Whitehead. Participants share their experiences with the text, its complexity, and its significance in the context of logic and mathematics.
Participants express a range of opinions about the book's readability and significance, with no clear consensus on its value or accessibility. Some find it awe-inspiring, while others view it as overly complex and difficult.
There are references to the potential confusion between Russell and Whitehead's work and Newton's "Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica," highlighting the importance of clarity in discussing these texts.
Treadstone 71 said:There's a copy at my university
All bragging rights are null and void unless you've actually tried to read the damn thing. Since I know that you haven't, you are not allowed to boast. ;)rhj23 said:there's THE copy of it at my university![]()
HallsofIvy said:I have read parts of it- the whole thing would be far too much! Principia Mathematica was an attempt (not entirely successful) to derive mathematics from the most fundamental concepts of logic. About half-way through the book they have finally produced enough concepts to define the natural numbers- and then requires several pages to prove that 2+ 2= 4! It's worth a look just for the "awe" value, but unless you are a professor of symbolic logic, I would not recommend buying it or trying to read the whole thing.
Learning mathematics and symbolic logic first would be better. While the title "Principia Mathematica" is Latin, the book itself was written in English. (Well, what's in between all the symbo's is English!)scott1 said:Try learning latin and then read it. It might be easier to read.