Undergrad Probabilities Associated with Sudden Changes in Potential

Click For Summary
Calculating probabilities for a particle experiencing a sudden change in potential involves using the inner product of wave functions from the initial and final states. In the case of a tritium atom undergoing beta decay to form a Helium-3 ion, the probability that the orbital electron remains in the ground state after the decay is determined by the modulus squared of the inner product of the respective wave functions. This approach is valid because the wave function does not have time to adjust to the sudden potential change, making the probability a measure of how much of the new state is represented in the old state. Although the sudden change approximation may break down near the nucleus due to rapid potential changes, any resulting corrections are typically minor. Understanding this framework is crucial for accurately calculating transition probabilities in quantum mechanics.
CDL
Messages
20
Reaction score
1
Hi, I have a question about calculating probabilities in situations where a particle experiences a sudden change in potential, in the case where both potentials are time independent.

For example, a tritium atom undergoing spontaneous beta decay, and turning into a Helium-3 ion. The orbital electron is initially in the ground state. The main point about this example is that the orbital electron essentially experiences a sudden change in Coulomb potential, with atomic number Z = 1 to Z = 2. Suppose we want to calculate the probability that after this beta decay the electron is left in the ground state of the new potential. In order to do this, we just take the inner product of the wave-function for the ground state state with Z = 1 with the 1s state, Z = 2, and take the modulus squared. There is our probability. Something like $$\mathbb{P}(\text{1s initial to 1s final}) = |\langle \psi_{1sf} | \psi_{1si} \rangle|^2$$ Where ## \psi_{1si}## and ##\psi_{1sf}## are the wave functions of the ground states in the initial and final potentials.

From what I have seen, this is what is generally done in these situations where the potential suddenly changes, but I'm not entirely comfortable with why this is done. Is this just another way of writing $$\mathbb{P}(\text{transition from state a to state b}) = |\langle \psi_{b} | \psi_{a} \rangle|^2$$

Could someone please explain why this is done, and why we can do this even though the potential changes?

Is it the fact that the wave-function doesn't have time to react to such a change in potential, and so the probability is a measure of 'how much of the proposed state b is present in the state a' ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
CDL said:
Is it the fact that the wave-function doesn't have time to react to such a change in potential, and so the probability is a measure of 'how much of the proposed state b is present in the state a' ?

Yes, this is the line of argument. Of course, this can't be entirely true for the whole wavefunction, as the change of the potential very near the nucleus is nearly infinite, so even if the decay occurs on a very short timescale somewhere very near the nucleus the "sudden change" approximation breaks down. But this will only lead to minor corrections.
 
  • Like
Likes CDL
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K