Probability Density in Quantum Mechanics

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of probability density in quantum mechanics, specifically for a free particle described by the wave function Psi = C1*exp(ikx-iEt). Participants clarify that the probability density is a function, not a numerical integral, represented as |Psi|^2 = C1^2. Normalization of this wave function is addressed, emphasizing that if the particle is confined to a region of length L, then |C1|^2 must equal 1/L. The implications of infinite length on normalization and the resulting constant probability density are also explored.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave functions in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with complex numbers and their properties
  • Knowledge of normalization in the context of probability density
  • Basic grasp of integrals and limits in calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of wave function normalization in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the implications of infinite potential wells on wave functions
  • Explore the mathematical formulation of probability densities in quantum systems
  • Investigate the role of complex coefficients in wave functions
USEFUL FOR

Students of quantum mechanics, physicists working with wave functions, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of probability densities in quantum systems.

JamesJames
Messages
204
Reaction score
0
Consider the wave function corresponding to a free particle in one dimension. Construct the probability density and graph it as a function of position. Is this wavefunction normalizable?

Now, I think that the function should be Psi = C1*exp(ikx-iEt). Thus, the probability density should be the integral over x of C1^2. What I am confused about is what are the limits of the integration...0 and inifinity? And also won' t the answer come out to be a constant if the upper limit is not infinity ? I am totally lost on the normalizable issue. :confused:

Thanks,
james
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
A probability density is NOT an integral- it is the density function itself which is what you give. The probability density is not a number, it is a function.
 
So, it should then be
[C1*exp(ikx-iEt)][C1*exp(-ikx+iEt)] which equals C1^2. I don' t see how you can get a function and what about the normalization question?

Any help would be great
 
Note, your C1 may be complex.

With regard to normalization, if you KNOW your particle is absolutely contained in some region then \left| C1\right|^2 = \frac {1}{L} where L is the size (length) of the region. Ask yourself what happens when L tends toward infinity.
 
I am still confused about the normalization...does it have to be of length L? Also the probability density would then produce a straight line rather than some curve which seems unusual to me.
 
Normalization means that you want to find the amplitude of the wave function and you do that by requiring the probability of finding the particle anywhere to be 1. If you KNOW it's in a box then the size of the box will be part of the normalization.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
556