Probability & Infinity: All Combinations Equal?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Pjpic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infinity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the probabilities associated with an infinite number of throws of two dice, specifically whether all combinations would occur an infinite number of times. It touches on concepts from probability theory, the nature of infinity, and the implications of fair versus loaded dice.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that if there is an actual infinity of throws, all combinations would happen an infinite number of times, assuming fair dice.
  • Others argue that while each combination has the same probability for every throw, the concept of infinity complicates the interpretation of outcomes.
  • A participant questions whether the limit as N approaches infinity implies a potential infinity rather than an actual infinity.
  • Another participant suggests that the terms "potential" and "actual" infinity are outdated in modern mathematics and advocates for a function-based approach to understanding infinite dice rolls.
  • Some participants clarify that for fair dice, each combination has a probability of 1/36, but the occurrence of combinations in an infinite set of rolls does not guarantee equal frequency of outcomes.
  • A later reply emphasizes that the limits of occurrences of combinations as N approaches infinity reflect their probabilities, but this does not mean all combinations will appear equally often in practice.
  • One participant asserts that applying finite probability concepts to infinite sets yields no useful results, indicating a fundamental disagreement on the applicability of probability theory in this context.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of infinity and its implications for probability. There is no consensus on whether all combinations would occur an infinite number of times, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the application of finite probability concepts to infinite scenarios.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in the understanding of infinity and probability, particularly in distinguishing between actual and potential infinity, and the implications of using finite probability concepts in infinite contexts.

Pjpic
Messages
235
Reaction score
1
If there is an actual infinity of throws of two dice, would all combinations have the same probability (that is each combination would happen an infinite amount of times)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They have the same probability for every throw (assuming they are fair).

(that is each combination would happen an infinite amount of times)
That would even happen with loaded dice.
You can make a stronger statement: if you consider the fraction of [result X] in the first N throws, this fraction goes to the same value (1/36 for regular dice) as N->infinity.
 
mfb said:
They have the same probability for every throw (assuming they are fair).

as N->infinity.

Does N-> Infinity imply a potential infinity instead of actual infinity?
 
Pjpic said:
Does N-> Infinity imply a potential infinity instead of actual infinity?

When we discuss heat, we never start with "Oh, fire is caused by phlogiston. But more recent thinkers consider it a chemical process." No. We discard ancient, obsolete ideas, and adopt the new ones.

It's nice that Aristotle talked about actual and potential infinity. If you're discussing the history of philosophical ideas about infinity, it's good information to know.

But since the work of Cantor in the 1880's and the set theorists of the 20th century, we now have much more precise concepts of mathematical infinity.

Let us dispense with the meaningless concepts of "potential" and "actual" infinity. Those terms have no meaning in modern mathematics.

An infinite set of dice rolls would be a function f:N -> {1,2,3,4,5,6} where N is the set of natural numbers. That's how to think about it and talk about it.
 
SteveL27 said:
An infinite set of dice rolls would be a function f:N -> {1,2,3,4,5,6} where N is the set of natural numbers. That's how to think about it and talk about it.

And for fair dice, each such set of rolls has probability zero.

As to whether a given infinite set of dice rolls happens an infinite number of times, you'd have to say how many infinite sets of rolls you intend to toss for that question to have any meaning.
 
mfb said:
They have the same probability for every throw (assuming they are fair).

I might not have my terms correct. Craps is based on 7 happening more often (I think the term for that is probability). But if there were an infinite number of throws, won't all combinations happen an equal (that is infinite) number of times?
 
Pjpic said:
mfb said:
They have the same probability for every throw (assuming they are fair).

I might not have my terms correct. Craps is based on 7 happening more often (I think the term for that is probability). But if there were an infinite number of throws, won't all combinations happen an equal (that is infinite) number of times?

When you think about doing a process an infinite number of times, saying 'each pair of dice comes up an infinite number of times' is not good enough. It's nice to know but if you want to say that all possibilities really come up equally often, then what you are really interested in is the following:

Let Xn, Yn be the results of the two dice on the nth throw, and let
S_N = \left( (X_1,Y_1),(X_2,Y_2),...,(X_N,Y_N) \right)

To say that, for example the pair (2,2) occurs as often as the pair (4,1), what you are interested in is (my notation here isn't great but should be comprehensive)
\# \left( (2,2) \in S_N \right) /N = \# \left( (4,1)\in S_N \right)
that is that you want the number of times (2,2) shows up in SN to be equal to the number of times (4,1) shows up. Now this is generally not going to be true, but what is true (and is what we mean when we say that (2,2) and (4,1) have equal probabilities) is that
\lim_{N\to \infty} \frac{ \# \left( (2,2) \in S_N \right)}{N} = \lim_{N \to \infty} \frac{ \# \left( (4,1) \in S_N \right)}{N}

those limits are just going to be the probability of (1,2) showing up in any roll, or (4,1) showing up in any roll, which is 1/36. If you had a loaded die which came up on a value of 1 with a probability of 9/10 and a 2,3,4,5,6 each with probability 1/20, then we would get that every pair (a,b) still shows up infinitely often as N goes to infinity, but you would not have
\lim_{N\to \infty} \frac{ \# \left( (2,2) \in S_N \right)}{N} = \lim_{N \to \infty} \frac{ \# \left( (4,1) \in S_N \right)}{N}
because the left hand side would be 81/100 and the right hand side would be 1/400.
 
Pjpic said:
mfb said:
They have the same probability for every throw (assuming they are fair).

I might not have my terms correct. Craps is based on 7 happening more often (I think the term for that is probability). But if there were an infinite number of throws, won't all combinations happen an equal (that is infinite) number of times?
"7" (as a sum?) is not one combination, but 6 (out of 36).
 
Pjpic said:
If there is an actual infinity of throws of two dice, would all combinations have the same probability (that is each combination would happen an infinite amount of times)?

No.

You are applying concepts from probability on a finite set to an infinite set. This gives no useful result.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
320
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K