MHB Probability of event modelled by poisson happening twice, consecutively

cmkluza
Messages
118
Reaction score
1
I'm not great at statistics, so I don't know where to start with this problem. It is stated as follows:

The number of telephone calls, T, received each minute can be modeled by a Poisson distribution with a mean of 3.5.

Find the probability that at least three telephone calls are received in each of two successive one-minute intervals.

So, I understand we have T ~ Po(3.5), and using a calculator or formula, I could easily identify the probability of having at least three telephone calls, but I don't understand what to do about that two successive part. Been thinking on this one for a while, but I'm at a loss as to what to do. Can anyone give me any suggestions on how to think about this to arrive at an answer?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You could multiply the probability of atleast 3 successive calls twice i.e P($$\ge$$ 3 phone calls) x P($$\ge$$ 3 phone calls), since our event gets completed only if we consider both of it's elements(in this case, the number of calls in two successive minutes).

This is just my suggestion as I, myself, am certainly not an ace in the area of statistics.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top