Probability of rolling a sum of 6 before a 7 or 9

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the probability of rolling a sum of 6 before rolling a sum of 7 or 9 when throwing two dice. Participants explore various approaches to derive the probability, including the use of infinite series and the independence of events.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant attempts to derive the probability using an equation involving the probabilities of rolling a 6, not rolling a 7, and not rolling a 9, leading to a calculated probability of approximately 0.5357.
  • Another participant clarifies that the game ends when a sum of 6, 7, or 9 is rolled and questions the initial assumptions about the independence of events.
  • A different participant points out that the events of not rolling a 7 and not rolling a 9 are not independent, suggesting a different approach to calculating the probability.
  • One participant proposes an alternative formulation of the problem, introducing a variable for the probability of not rolling a 6, 7, or 9, and arrives at a probability of 0.35.
  • There is a discussion about the dependency of variables x and w, with some participants asserting that they are independent while others question this assumption.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the independence of events and the correctness of the initial calculations. No consensus is reached regarding the final probability, as multiple competing approaches are presented.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight potential misunderstandings regarding the independence of events and the conditions under which probabilities are calculated, but these issues remain unresolved.

DanielJackins
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Having a lot of trouble with this question.

So first I tried making an equation, and I wrote that the probability = P(rolling a 6)+P(rolling a 6 and not a 7 on the first roll and not a 9 on the first roll) + P(rolling a 6 and not a 7 on the first roll and not a 9 on the first roll and not a 7 on the second roll and not a 9 on the second roll) + ...

At this point I said let P(6) = x, P(not a 7) = y, P(not a 9) = z.

So I have P= x+xyz+xy^2z^2+... Factor out the x;
x(1+yz+y^2z^2+...)

Then I rewrote that as x*the sum of (y^i)(z^i) from i = 0 to infinity. Using an identity I got this to be x*[1/(1-yz)]. I subbed the numbers into that, and got .5357 as an answer. Now, I don't know what the correct answer is but that seems wrong to me.

Can anyone help?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume you are throwing two dice, and that the game ends once the sum is 6, 7 or 9, and that you seek the probability for the game to end with a 6.

If the game ends after the first throw, can you find the probability for a 6?

What can be said about the next throw, and the ones thereafter? (the same)

If you need to be further convinced, write down, and compute, the corresponding infinite sum of probabilities, and you will again get the same answer.
 
So I do have the right answer?
 
You first mistake is that the events of not having a 9, and of not having a 7, are not independent, so you can't multiply them. Your second mistake is that the the event of getting the 6 on the second roll requires no 9, 7, OR 6 on the first roll.

If instead we have the single event: w = "the probability the roll is not a 9 or a 7 or a 6" then the probability is
(x + xw + xw^2 + xw^3 + ...) = x (1 / (1-w))
substituting x = 5/36, w = (1 - (3/36 + 6/36 + 5/36)), the probability is 0.35.
 
DanielJackins said:
So I do have the right answer?

Sir, I had to make a guess at what your question was, so I suggest you first clear that up. Assuming for a moment that my guess was correct, and that we are throwing two dice, and that you are aware that throwing 7 is the most likely, I do not understand how you can possibly consider the chance of getting a 6 first to be more than 53%.
 
mXSCNT said:
You first mistake is that the events of not having a 9, and of not having a 7, are not independent, so you can't multiply them. Your second mistake is that the the event of getting the 6 on the second roll requires no 9, 7, OR 6 on the first roll.

If instead we have the single event: w = "the probability the roll is not a 9 or a 7 or a 6" then the probability is
(x + xw + xw^2 + xw^3 + ...) = x (1 / (1-w))
substituting x = 5/36, w = (1 - (3/36 + 6/36 + 5/36)), the probability is 0.35.

You should have another go at correcting your answer. But you are getting closer. (Whats the chance of throwing 9?)
 
Okay, that makes sense now (mostly). Wouldn't x and w be dependent as well?
 
DanielJackins said:
Okay, that makes sense now (mostly). Wouldn't x and w be dependent as well?

no. in the expression (x + xw + xw^2 + xw^3 + ...)

w in xw is the probability 6,7 or 9 wasn't thrown on the first turn, and x is the probability 6 is thrown on the second turn. These are independent.

in xw^2, w^2 is the probabiltiy 6,7 or 9 wasn't thrown the first two turns, and x is the probability 6 is thrown the 3rd turn etc.

The addition of x,xw,xw^2 etc. is all right too, as these are the probablities of the mutually exclusive events that a 6 is thrown first on the 1st, 2nd, 3rd,... turns
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K