MHB Probability of Spin Resulting in Even # or <4

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the probability of a spin resulting in an even number or a number less than 4. The initial calculation yielded results of 3/4 or 6/8, using union set operations for the probabilities of 4/8 and 3/8. Participants agree that the correct answer is 3/4, which is not included in the provided answer choices. The conversation highlights a potential oversight in the options given. Overall, the consensus points to 3/4 as the accurate probability.
MIIF
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I tried to answer it and got 3/4 or 6/8 after using the union set operation for 4/8 or 1/2 and 3/8, based on what is being asked in the problem. https://www.mathplanet.com/education...lity-of-eventshttps://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180329/39d5da5505f3c8ccaa27619bfbfd516c.jpghttps://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180329/3cd8ecb6e781e932cdcc6cdba59ea7b5.jpg
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
MIIF said:
I tried to answer it and got 3/4 or 6/8 after using the union set operation for 4/8 or 1/2 and 3/8, based on what is being asked in the problem. https://www.mathplanet.com/education...lity-of-events
Hi MIIF, and welcome to MHB!

I agree with you. The answer should be 3/4, which is not listed among the choices A.-D.
 
Opalg said:
Hi MIIF, and welcome to MHB!

I agree with you. The answer should be 3/4, which is not listed among the choices A.-D.
Thanks!
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top