MHB Probability of winning at least two games in a row - - - Elementary Probability

AI Thread Summary
In a game against two players, A and B, with winning probabilities of 90% and 10% respectively, the discussion focuses on which sequence of games maximizes the chance of winning at least two in a row. Two scenarios are analyzed: starting against player A or player B. The probability of winning two consecutive games is calculated using a contingency tree, revealing that the first scenario yields a probability of 0.09 for winning the first two games. The analysis also considers the probability of losing the first game but winning the next two, which varies based on the chosen sequence. Ultimately, the second scenario is suggested to provide a better chance of achieving the desired outcome.
checkitagain
Messages
137
Reaction score
1
You can play against player A or player B in an all-skill game
(such as chess or checkers).

Suppose there are no ties/draws.

On average you beat player A 90% of the time in this game,
and on average you beat player B 10% in this game.

You will play three games in row, and each game will be
against one player at a time.You will choose one of these scenarios:1st game - - a game against player A
2nd game - - a game against player B
3rd game - - a game against player AOR1st game - - a game against player B
2nd game - - a game against player A
3rd game - - a game against player B-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Which scenario should you choose to have the greatest
chance of winning at least two games in a row? * *

** This is adapted from a problem presented by Martin Gardner.

 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
checkittwice said:
You can play against player A or player B in an all-skill game
(such as chess or checkers).

Suppose there are no ties/draws.

On average you beat player A 90% of the time in this game,
and on average you beat player B 10% in this game.

You will play three games in row, and each game will be
against one player at a time.You will choose one of these scenarios:1st game - - a game against player A
2nd game - - a game against player B
3rd game - - a game against player AOR1st game - - a game against player B
2nd game - - a game against player A
3rd game - - a game against player B-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Which scenario should you choose to have the greatest
chance of winning at least two games in a row? * *

** This is adapted from a problem presented by Martin Gardner.



The second.

Construct a contingency tree to investigate further.

In both such trees there is a branch where the first two games are won, this branch occurs with probability \(0.09\) (the outcome of the third game does not effect the probability of winning two games in a row along this branch).

The other main branch involves loseing the first game and winning the remaining two. This occurs with probability \(0.1 \times 0.1 \times 0.9\) in the first case and \(0.9 \times 0.9 \times 0.1\) in the second.CB
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top