Probability Q: Show B^c Subset of A^c

  • Thread starter Thread starter GreenPrint
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a set theory problem involving two events A and B, specifically the relationship between their complements. The original poster attempts to show that if A is a subset of B, then the complement of B is a subset of the complement of A.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definitions of subsets and complements, questioning how to demonstrate the subset relationship between B^c and A^c. There are attempts to clarify the implications of being in the complements of the sets and how that relates to the original sets.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the definitions and logical implications of set theory. Some participants express confusion about the relationships between the sets and their complements, while others attempt to clarify these concepts without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

There are questions regarding the definitions of the universal set and null set, as well as the implications of specific elements being in the complements of the sets. Participants are navigating through foundational concepts in set theory as they relate to the problem at hand.

GreenPrint
Messages
1,186
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose that for two events A and B. A [itex]\subseteq[/itex] B. Show that [itex]B^{c} \subseteq A^{c}[/itex].

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



[itex]1- B \subseteq 1- A[/itex]

I'm not sure where to go from here. Thanks for any help you can provide.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's really a "set" problem rather than a probability problem. I presume your "1" represents the "universal set" rather than a number?

The "standard" way to prove "[itex]X\subset Y[/itex]" is to start "let [itex]x\in X[/itex]" and, using the definitions and information you are given about X and Y, end with "therefore [itex]x\in Y[/itex]". Here, "X" is the set [itex]B^c[/itex], the complement of B, the set of all objects that are not in B.

So, if [itex]x\in B^c[/itex], then x is not in B. Since A is a subset of B (every member of A is also in B), x is not in A and so [itex]x\in A^c[/itex].
 
Hi HallsofIvy,

Is universal set and null set the same?

thanks,

green
 
GreenPrint said:
Hi HallsofIvy,

Is universal set and null set the same?


No. Not the same.
 
You mean by universal set Ω?

Also how does showing that
x[itex]\in B^{c}[/itex] and x[itex]\in A^{c}[/itex]

show that

[itex]B^{c} \subseteq A^{c}[/itex]?

I'm not seeing this
 
Okay, it sounds like you are using [itex]\Omega[/itex] to mean the "universal set", the set of all things we are allowing in our sets.

It is NOT true that "[itex]x\in B^c[/itex] and [itex]x\in A^c[/itex]" implies [itex]B^c\subseteq A^c[/itex]" and I did not claim it was. What I showed was that if[itex]x\in B^c[/itex] implies [itex]x\in A^c[/itex], then [itex]B^c\subseteq A^c[/itex].

That follows directly from the definition of "[itex]\subset[/itex]". If you are doing problems like that you surely should know that definition.
 
[itex]B^{c} \subseteq A^{c}[/itex]

This means that B complement is a subset or equal to A complement. If x is an element of B complement and A complement than why must B complement be a subset or equal to A complement? How do I know that A complement is not a subset of B complement?

Since x is an element of A complement and B complement then...

B complement must be a subset or equal to A complement
or
A complement must be a subset or equal to B complement

how do I know which one is true?
 
GreenPrint said:
If x is an element of B complement and A complement than why must B complement be a subset or equal to A complement? How do I know that A complement is not a subset of B complement?

Since x is an element of A complement and B complement then...

B complement must be a subset or equal to A complement
or
A complement must be a subset or equal to B complement
None of that makes sense. If some x is an element of B complement and A complement then all that proves is that their intersection is non-empty. You need to think in terms "if x is an element of ... then x is an element of ..." You're trying to prove that Bc ⊆ Ac. Can you fill in the "..." ?
 
GreenPrint said:
[itex]B^{c} \subseteq A^{c}[/itex]

This means that B complement is a subset or equal to A complement. If x is an element of B complement and A complement than why must B complement be a subset or equal to A complement?
I didn't say that! A single "x" tells us nothing. The point was that this is true for all members of B complement. That is the definition of "[itex]X\subseteq Y[/itex]": for all [itex]x\in X[/itex], [itex]x\in Y[/itex].

How do I know that A complement is not a subset of B complement?

Since x is an element of A complement and B complement then...

B complement must be a subset or equal to A complement
or
A complement must be a subset or equal to B complement

how do I know which one is true?
By knowing what "subset" and "member" mean! Go back and look at my argument, showing that any element of B complement must be a member of A complement.

And that is the definition of "B complement is a subset of A complement".

If your are asking, as you appear to be, "How can I prove this without knowing any of the definitions", you can't!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K