"Probabilty amplitude" meaning ?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter microsansfil
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Amplitude
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of probability amplitude, particularly its mathematical interpretation and relevance within the framework of probability theory and quantum mechanics. Participants explore its definitions, applications, and the distinctions between probability amplitudes and traditional probability distributions.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that probability amplitude is not a concept in mathematical probability, but rather a tool used in quantum physics to connect wave properties with the probability of locating a particle.
  • It is noted that a probability amplitude becomes a probability density when squared, with probability density being a well-established mathematical concept.
  • One participant draws an analogy between using complex numbers to represent probability distributions and the representation of vectors as n-tuples, suggesting that the mathematical representation can obscure the underlying concepts.
  • Another participant emphasizes the need to explain the usefulness of probability amplitudes in quantum mechanics compared to traditional probability distributions, indicating that this involves understanding the physical principles of quantum mechanics.
  • A claim is made that any non-negative real number can be expressed as the product of a complex number and its conjugate, framing this as a definition of probability amplitude, which is said to simplify calculations in quantum mechanics.
  • There is a suggestion that even in classical physics, probability can be expressed in terms of complex probability amplitudes, although they do not obey linear equations as in quantum mechanics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the classification of probability amplitude within mathematical probability theory, with some asserting it is not part of that framework while others explore its applications and implications in quantum mechanics. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the broader acceptance of probability amplitude in mathematical contexts.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the definitions and assumptions surrounding probability amplitude and its relationship to probability distributions. The conversation reflects a variety of interpretations and applications without reaching a consensus.

microsansfil
Messages
325
Reaction score
43
Physics news on Phys.org
That is NOT a concept in mathematical probability. As the Wikipedia article linked to says, it is a concept used in Quantum Physics used to link wave properties with probability of finding a particle in a given location.
 
HallsofIvy said:
That is NOT a concept in mathematical probability. As the Wikipedia article linked to says, it is a concept used in Quantum Physics used to link wave properties with probability of finding a particle in a given location.

A probability amplitude, becomes a probability density after squaring. The mathematical concept of probability density is well known, but Physicists speak of probability amplitude as being a mathematical concept.

https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...or-nature-of-probability.774898/#post-4878368Patrick
 
Using a complex number to represent a discrete probability distribution with two possible outcomes is an application of mathematics. It is a convention for coordinatizing.

We could make an analogy. Vectors and n-tuples of numbers are different mathematical concepts. Using n-tuples of numbers to represent vectors is so convenient that the two concepts merge in some people's minds. However, the abstract definition of a vector space can be stated without referring to n-tuples of numbers. The n-tuples are a particular way to coordinatize certain kinds of vectors. .

Explaining why it is useful to use the repesentation of probability amplitudes in QM instead of dealing with probability distributions as lists of real numbers would involve explaining the physical facts of QM. (My favorite explanation is http://henry.pha.jhu.edu/quantum.html ). It is tempting to think that mathematics ought to imitate Nature and thus it should found probability theory on probability amplitudes - similar to the way that some introductory textbooks teach the theory of vectors by defining them as n-tuples of real numbers. However, there are many applications of probability theory where using complex numbers to coordinatize a probability distribution is inconvenient..
 
Last edited:
Thank for your answer.

Stephen Tashi said:
Using a complex number to represent a discrete probability distribution with two possible outcomes is an application of mathematics. It is a convention for coordinatizing.
I don't see here the concept of amplitude probability distribution.

Stephen Tashi said:
Explaining why it is useful to use the repesentation of probability amplitudes in QM instead of dealing with probability distributions as lists of real numbers would involve explaining the physical facts of QM.
The physical meaning is clear :

http://skepticaleducator.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/2SlitExplanationCrackpot3.pdf
1.2 Probability amplitudes : http://www.physics.ox.ac.uk/qubit/tutes/The%20Physics%20of%20Quantum%20Mechanics,%20Binney%20and%20Skinner.pdf

Patrick
 
Last edited by a moderator:
microsansfil said:
I don't see here the concept of amplitude probability distribution.

Why would you? You wouldn't necessarily see information about to coordinatize a probability distribution in a link to the concept of a probability distribution. The sum of the values of a discrete probability distribution is 1. So when you represent a distribution with two values as a complex number you can stipulate the convention that the sums of the squares of the real and imaginary parts is 1. From a purely mathematical point of view, you could stipulate some other convention. For example, you might stipulate that of the real and imaginary parts are non-negative real numbers that (unsquared) sum to 1. The convenience of one convention or the other depends on how probability distributions behave in a particular application.

HallsofIvey is correct. The concept of a probability amplitude is not a concept used in the axiomatics of mathematical probability theory.
 
Stephen Tashi said:
Why would you?

As a comparison with probability density may be made"Advantages of probability amplitude over probability density in quantum mechanics". Thus in the context of mathematics we hope to find a clear definition of the level of that of the probability density. in Quantum Physics, probability amplitude it is a concept used to link wave function with a probability distribution for the purpose of prediction.

Patrick
 
Any non-negative real number ##p## can be written as ##p=\psi^*\psi##, where ##\psi## is a complex number and * denotes complex conjugation (of the symbol at the left from *). If ##p## is probability, then ##\psi## is called probability amplitude. This concept is useful in quantum mechanics, because the probability amplitude (unlike the probability itself) turns out to obey linear equations, which makes probability amplitude simpler to calculate than probability itself.

Even in classical (i.e. not quantum) physics probability can be expressed in terms of a complex probability amplitude, but there it doesn't obey a linear equation:
http://lanl.arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0505143
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K