Problem 7.7 and its solution from A Quantum Approach to Condensed Matter

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the integral equation related to Problem 7.7 from "A Quantum Approach to Condensed Matter." The main confusion arises from the use of the approximation for the hyperbolic tangent function, which leads to divergence in the integral as it does not approach zero for small values of E. Participants suggest that the integral's limits and the variable of integration may be incorrectly defined, specifically noting the transition from dE to d\hat{\varepsilon}. A proposed correction to the equation clarifies the relationship between the variables involved. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately defining parameters and understanding the limits of integration for proper convergence.
MathematicalPhysicist
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,662
Reaction score
372
Homework Statement
Problem 7.7 asks for:
How does the electronic specific heat of a superconductor vary with temperature ##T## as ##T\to 0##?
Relevant Equations
See the attachment below.
Well, I don't understand the integral part of ##1/(VD) = \int_0^{\hbar \omega_D}\frac{\tanh(\beta E/2}{E}dE## and ##\tanh(\beta E/2) \approx 1-2\exp(-\beta E)##, then he writes the following (which I don't understand how did he get it):
$$\frac{1}{VD} = \sinh^{-1} (\hbar \omega/\Delta(0)) = \sinh^{-1}(\hbar \omega/ \Delta(T)) - 2\int_0^{\hbar \omega_D}\exp(-\beta E)/E dE$$

If I plug the approximation of ##\tanh## I get the following:
$$1/(VD)=\log(\hbar \omega_D)-\log 0 -2\int \exp(-\beta E)/E dE$$

Doesn't seem to converge.
I don't understand this solution...
Any help?

Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot from 2019-12-22 10-40-26.png
    Screenshot from 2019-12-22 10-40-26.png
    70 KB · Views: 309
Physics news on Phys.org
The given approximation is good for large ##\beta E## (which is generally what you want), but the integral needs the tanh at small ##\beta E##.
##\tanh(\beta E/2) \approx 1-2\exp(-\beta E)## makes the integral diverge as this approximation doesn't go to zero for ##E\to 0##.

I don't have the book, could there be a mistake with the integral borders?
 
I noticed in the integral, it's with respect to ##d\hat \varepsilon## rather than ##dE##. How is ##\hat \varepsilon## defined?
 
vela said:
I noticed in the integral, it's with respect to ##d\hat \varepsilon## rather than ##dE##. How is ##\hat \varepsilon## defined?
Yes, I think you are correct.
On page 249 in Eq. (7.5.7) we have the following identity:
$$E_{\vec{k}}=[\hat{\epsilon}_{\vec{k}}^2+\Delta^2_k(T)]^{1/2}$$

I think I can see how the calculation is done, and I believe it should be ##\frac{1}{VD} = \sinh^{-1} (\hbar \omega/\Delta(0)) - \sinh^{-1}(\hbar \omega/ \Delta(T)) - 2\int_0^{\hbar \omega_D}\exp(-\beta E)/E d\hat{\epsilon}##, I'll do the calculation and I'll let you know if I need more help.

Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K