Show that a matrix is a Lorentz transformation

In summary, the conversation discusses the problem of showing that ##e^{\Omega}## is a Lorentz transformation along the x-axis with a rapidity of ##\psi##. The attempt at a solution involves calculating ##\Omega^n## and using the definition of the exponential of a matrix. A related variation of the problem is also discussed.
  • #1
17
0

Homework Statement


Given the matrix
$$ \Omega = \begin{pmatrix}
0 & -\psi & 0 & 0 \\
-\psi & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
\end{pmatrix}$$
show that ## e^{\Omega}## is a Lorentz transformation along the x-axis with ## \beta = tanh(\psi)##

Homework Equations


During the lesson we derived from the standard Lorentz transformation matrix the following matrix, where ##\psi## is the rapidity:

$$ \Lambda = \begin{pmatrix}
cosh(\psi) & -sinh(\psi) & 0 & 0 \\
-sinh(\psi) & cosh(\psi) & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
\end{pmatrix} $$

Other equations:
##cosh(\psi)=\gamma##
##sinh(\psi)=\gamma \beta##

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
From ## \beta = tanh(\psi)##:
## \psi=arctg(\beta) = \ln\sqrt{\frac{1+\beta}{1-\beta}} ##
## e^{-\psi} = \sqrt{\frac{1-\beta}{1+\beta}}##
I think i have to show that the two matrices (##\Lambda## and ##e^{-\Omega}##) are the same, but i can't understand why there are zeros on the diagonal. For the two first zeros on the diagonal ##cosh(\psi)=0##, so ##\psi = \frac \pi 2##.
I think there's an error somewhere, because with the previous formulas it turns out that ##\beta = 1## and ##v=c##.

To be honest, i can't find the right way to solve the problem, maybe it's just algebra? Can you please give me a hint? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
What is the definition of ##e^{\Omega}##?

Can you calculate ##\Omega^n##?
 
  • #3
##\Omega^n## can be obtained multiplying the matrix n times. I underestimated the definition of ##e^{\Omega}##, i guess i can't obtain it taking the exponential of each element... now I'm reading the definition on wikipedia.
 
  • #4
fineTuner said:
##\Omega^n## can be obtained multiplying the matrix n times. I underestimated the definition of ##e^{\Omega}##, i guess i can't obtain it taking the exponential of each element... now I'm reading the definition on wikipedia.
The exponential of a matrix is defined as in quantum mechanics, through its Taylor expansion (here around ##\psi=0##).
 

Suggested for: Show that a matrix is a Lorentz transformation

Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
881
Replies
1
Views
616
Back
Top