MHB Problem I am stuck on, simplifying radicals in denominator again

GrannySmith
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
:mad: I really hate these problems.

(2+√7)/(3-√-11). What the heck?

I start out by multiplying both sides with the conjugate again. This is where I am stuck lol. Can someone tell me what I am doing wrong while multiplying the conjugate?

(3 - √-11) is the same as 3 - √11i correct? So I multiply (3 - √11i) with (3 + √11i). I don't understand how this goes, but I tried.

3 times 3 is 9.

3 times √11i is 3√11i

-√11i times 3 is -3√11i canceling out 3√11i

-√11i times √11i is -11i? A bit confused on how this works and I'm guessing this is where I made a mistake?

On top we have (2+√7)(3 + √11i).

2 times 3 is 6

2 times √11i is 2√11i

√7 times 3 is 3√7

What would √7 times √11i be? √77i? Can you multiply a normal square root with an imaginary square root?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
GrannySmith said:
-√11i times √11i is -11i? A bit confused on how this works and I'm guessing this is where I made a mistake?

You guess correctly that this is where you made your mistake...

\displaystyle \begin{align*} -\sqrt{11}i\cdot \sqrt{11}i &= - \left( \sqrt{11} \right) ^2 i^2 \\ &= -11 \left( -1 \right) \\ &= + 11 \end{align*}
 
Good catch, Prove It. I delete my post with incorrect results. This still follows the pattern of $(a-b)(a+b)=(a+b)(a-b)=a^2-b^2$. In this case, $b=i \cdot \sqrt{11}$ thus $-b^2=-i^2(\sqrt{11})^2$, just like you wrote.
 
Prove It said:
You guess correctly that this is where you made your mistake...

\displaystyle \begin{align*} -\sqrt{11}i\cdot \sqrt{11}i &= - \left( \sqrt{11} \right) ^2 i^2 \\ &= -11 \left( -1 \right) \\ &= + 11 \end{align*}

You're awesome! Makes so much sense now.

(-√6i)(-√14i) would be (√84i^2) correct? Then the i^2 would make it -√84? Just want to make sure I fully understand this.
 
GrannySmith said:
You're awesome! Makes so much sense now.

(-√6i)(-√14i) would be (√84i^2) correct? Then the i^2 would make it -√84? Just want to make sure I fully understand this.

Yes, but also remember

\displaystyle \begin{align*} \sqrt{84} &= \sqrt{ 4 \cdot 21 } \\ &= \sqrt{4} \cdot \sqrt{21} \\ &= 2\sqrt{21} \end{align*}
 
Just a quick note:

With two complex numbers $a+bi$ and $a-bi$ their product is:

$(a+bi)(a-bi) = a^2 - a(bi) + (bi)a - (bi)^2$.

Now the terms $-a(bi)$ and $(bi)a = a(bi)$ cancel, leaving us with:

$a^2 - (bi)^2 = a^2 - b^2i^2 = a^2 - b^2(-1) = a^2 + b^2$.

In other words, a SUM of two (real) squares can be viewed as a DIFFERENCE of two complex squares:

$a^2 + b^2 = a^2 - (bi)^2$

This unusual "trick" is what throws most people off, because we are used to thinking of squares as "always positive" (which is true for real numbers, but NOT for complex numbers, where "positive" doesn't really MEAN anything).

In general:

$\dfrac{1}{a+bi} = \dfrac{a-bi}{a^2+b^2}$

this formula is well worth remembering, since it's a real time-saver:

In your example, to compute:

$\dfrac{1}{3 - \sqrt{-11}} = \dfrac{1}{3 - \sqrt{11}i}$

so we can multiply instead of divide (because let's face it, division is a pain in the a-erm, anterior region)

instead of going through the routine of multiplying by the conjugate top and bottom, we do THIS:

$3^2 = 9$ and $(\sqrt{11})^2 = 11$ and $9 + 11 = 20$

so we have:

$\frac{1}{11}(3 + \sqrt{11}i)$

As for your "multiplication" question, it is true that:

$\sqrt{7}(\sqrt{11}i) = (\sqrt{7}\sqrt{11})i = \sqrt{77}i$

because the complex numbers form a FIELD, and this means that multiplication is associative.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top