Problem of objects falling from a height

  • Thread starter Thread starter Spensy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Falling Height
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving an object, specifically a stone, falling from a height, with a focus on calculating the height of the bridge based on the time of fall and the acceleration due to gravity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply the kinematic equation for uniformly accelerated motion to determine the height of the bridge, questioning the correctness of their calculation. Some participants affirm the approach while others reiterate the formula used.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes affirmations of the original poster's method and calculations, with some participants providing additional comments on the formula used. There is no explicit consensus, but the conversation appears to be constructive with participants engaging in clarification.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of using the appropriate forum for such questions, indicating a potential guideline for future posts. The initial conditions, such as the initial velocity being zero, are acknowledged but not debated.

Spensy
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
A stone falls from the high bridge and reaches the ground in 10 sec, then height of bridge is approximately __________
(a) 590m
(b) 460m
(c) 500m
(d) 1000m



the object falling has an acceleration due to gravity of 9.8m/s^2 and it reaches the ground in 10 secs so the using the formula. S= vit+1/2at^2
where vi = to zero , a=9.8m/s^2 and time t = 10secs

S = 0*10+1/2(9.8)(10)^2
S = 4.9*100
S = 490
S = 500m approximately.

Am i Correct ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
height = 0.5 times acceleration times (time to the power 2) since initial velocity =0
 
elabed haidar said:
height = 0.5 times acceleration times (time to the power 2) since initial velocity =0
I think the OP is aware of this--since that very formula was shown in the first post.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K