Problem on Equilibrium ( STATICS )

  • Thread starter Thread starter lakuzamalakuzam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equilibrium Statics
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 2K views
lakuzamalakuzam
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
1601705877930.png

so i was wondering what assumptions needed to make this solvable and ' support at both thrust collars can totally support the moments of 400 Nm before they slip' means which axis of moment
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this a homework problem?

There is a contradiction, in that the “thrust collars” must withstand a moment.
Thrust would be axial, moment would be about the axis.

Is that a moment of 400 N⋅m each, making 800 N⋅m, or a total of 400 N⋅m together ?

How much does the structure weigh, is that important ?

You need to provide some feedback to the answers you receive.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: lakuzamalakuzam
Yeah It's a homework problem.
I'm not sure what the problem means when it says 400 NM but from my understanding i think it is in OA axis with assumption that the system is properly aligned.
The structure weight is negligible.
 
lakuzamalakuzam said:
The structure weight is negligible.
Is that a specified assumption, or an additional assumption ?
 
lakuzamalakuzam said:
Yeah It's a homework problem.
I'm not sure what the problem means when it says 400 NM but from my understanding i think it is in OA axis with assumption that the system is properly aligned.
The structure weight is negligible.
but then there will be 9 unknowns ( Fx ,F//OA, Fperpendicular to OA, couple in OA axis for each of the thrust collar and W) with 3 scalar equation and 1 vector equation = 4 eq
so i think i will have to make further assumptions like there are no support reaction on the upper thrust collar and now there are 5 unknowns which isn't solvable
 
Last edited:
Baluncore said:
Is that a specified assumption, or an additional assumption ?
additional assumption
 
The horizontal radius from O-B confuses things.
Too many equations, and not enough understanding of the system.

To resolve the moment, should it not be sufficient to resolve the distance of the hanging weight from ZY plane that contains the O-A axis, and the angle of the O-A axis to the horizontal ?