Solving a Moment Vector Direction Problem: An Example from Statics Textbook

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
mhrob24
Messages
53
Reaction score
9
Homework Statement
Moving a force to a point not on the line of action
Relevant Equations
M = FD
This isn’t a HW problem per say, but it’s an example shown in my statics textbook that is used to try an explain that you need to add a couple moment to move a force to a point not on the line of action, and I’m just not seeing how the direction of the couple moment is correct. See the image below:

62875A0F-7B49-4756-9F57-3C4D46B025B1.jpeg

Using the RHR (extending r1 and crossing into F1)and adding an opposite pair of forces at the point you are moving the force to (point “O”), the direction of the moment vector to me looks like it should be pointing to the left (into page, clockwise moment)….but the book is showing the opposite. The only way I see that moment vector direction being correct is if -F is applied What am I not seeing here? I feel like I understand the concept, but this specific example is tripping me up.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is the preceding example given, and this makes 100% sense to me. You add equal and opposite forces to the point you are moving the force to, and you still end up with an equivalent system: a downward force and a clockwise couple moment. So I know I get it….I just don’t know what I’m not seeing in the other example they give.

0C67DD8D-2F94-45A5-B19B-64EAF1C17B34.jpeg
 
Drawing (a) is poorly constructed and it seems that the directions of the vector moments have little to do with that tridimensional representation.
Those r's and F's must be perpendicular to each other for Mo=rxF.