Solving a Moment Vector Direction Problem: An Example from Statics Textbook

  • #1
mhrob24
53
9
Homework Statement
Moving a force to a point not on the line of action
Relevant Equations
M = FD
This isn’t a HW problem per say, but it’s an example shown in my statics textbook that is used to try an explain that you need to add a couple moment to move a force to a point not on the line of action, and I’m just not seeing how the direction of the couple moment is correct. See the image below:

62875A0F-7B49-4756-9F57-3C4D46B025B1.jpeg

Using the RHR (extending r1 and crossing into F1)and adding an opposite pair of forces at the point you are moving the force to (point “O”), the direction of the moment vector to me looks like it should be pointing to the left (into page, clockwise moment)….but the book is showing the opposite. The only way I see that moment vector direction being correct is if -F is applied What am I not seeing here? I feel like I understand the concept, but this specific example is tripping me up.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
This is the preceding example given, and this makes 100% sense to me. You add equal and opposite forces to the point you are moving the force to, and you still end up with an equivalent system: a downward force and a clockwise couple moment. So I know I get it….I just don’t know what I’m not seeing in the other example they give.

0C67DD8D-2F94-45A5-B19B-64EAF1C17B34.jpeg
 
  • #3
Drawing (a) is poorly constructed and it seems that the directions of the vector moments have little to do with that tridimensional representation.
Those r's and F's must be perpendicular to each other for Mo=rxF.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
481
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top