Problem on integrating dirac delta function

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 3K views
tan90ds
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi there,
I am trying to integrate this: http://imm.io/oqKi
I should get the second line from the integral, but I can't show it.
This should somehow relate to the Heaviside step function, or I am completely wrong.
Any ideas?

Sorry about the url, I fixed it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyhow, whatever "imm.io/oqKi " is:

The Dirac delta "function" isn't a function in the usual sense, so can't integrate it in the usual sense, either.
 
The "Dirac delta funtion" is not really a function, as arildno says. It is a "generalized function" or "distribution"- a linear operator on functions.

By definition
[tex]\int_a^b f(x)\delta(x)dx= f(0)[/tex]
if a< 0< b, 0 otherwise.

That means that
[tex]\int_a^b \delta(g(x))f(x) dx= f(c)[/tex]
if g(c)= 0 for some c between a and b.
 
HallsofIvy said:
The "Dirac delta funtion" is not really a function, as arildno says. It is a "generalized function" or "distribution"- a linear operator on functions.

By definition
[tex]\int_a^b f(x)\delta(x)dx= f(0)[/tex]
if a< 0< b, 0 otherwise.

That means that
[tex]\int_a^b \delta(g(x))f(x) dx= f(c)<br /> if g(c)= 0 for some c between a and b.[/tex]
[tex] <br /> This makes sense for why they put [tex](x-x_0)\cos(\theta)+(y-y_0)\sin(\theta)=0[/tex] after the second line.<br /> <br /> Actually I am in the middle of proving the simple backprojection of the Radon transform of a dot can be viewed as a two dimensional convolution of [tex]\frac{1}{\sqrt{x^2+y^2}}[/tex] and the original function. I used the Dirac Delta to formulate the dot, so this is just for the convenience of prove.<br /> <br /> The Dirac Delta also has this property:[tex]\int\delta(\alpha x)dx = \frac{1}{|\alpha|}[/tex], I think this might help.[/tex]
 
Last edited: