Problem: particle in infinitely deep potential

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a quantum mechanics problem involving a particle in an infinitely deep potential well and a perturbation scenario. The original poster presents a mathematical expression for the wave function and Hamiltonian, along with several tasks related to energy minimization and perturbation theory.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to determine the normalization constant and calculate the expected energy using the variational method. They express uncertainty about minimizing energy with respect to parameters A and B.
  • Some participants clarify that the variational principle provides an upper bound on the ground state energy and suggest finding values of A and B that minimize this function.
  • There are questions regarding the calculation of perturbation corrections to the ground state energy and wave function.

Discussion Status

Participants have engaged in exploring the variational method and perturbation theory. Some have provided clarifications and guidance on the approach to take, while the original poster has reported finding specific energy values but remains uncertain about the perturbation aspects.

Contextual Notes

The original poster has indicated confusion regarding the application of perturbation theory and the dimensional consistency of the potential function. There is an acknowledgment of non-degenerate states in the unperturbed system, which may influence the approach to perturbation corrections.

paly4
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A square well: 0≤x≤L, V=0, for others x V=∞
ψ=N[x(x-L)+Ax2(x-L)+Bx(x-L)2]
H=-[STRIKE]h[/STRIKE]/2m*d2/dx2+V(x)

a) Determine N
b) Use the Rayleigh-Ritz variational method to obtain the <ψ|H|ψ> as a function of A and B, and minimize the energy with respect to A and B
c) Discuss how many distinct values of the pair (A, B) that you obtain and do you get more than one energy? If yes, what are they?
d) Compare you results to the exact particle in the box and discuss the error.
a') Consider the same system, but now V(x)=x for 0≤x≤L
Compute the first order perturbation correction to the ground state energy
b') Compute the first order perturbation correction to the ground state wave function

The Attempt at a Solution



a) I found with SAGE mathematical software that N2=[itex]\frac{\sqrt{210}}{\sqrt{(2B<sup>2</sup>-3AB+2A<sup>2</sup>)L<sup>7</sup>+7(A-B)L<sup>6</sup>+7L<sup>5</sup>}}[/itex]
b) I'm not sure in that. But I've calculated <E>=-[STRIKE]h[/STRIKE]/2m*∫ψ(x)*ψ''(x)*dx from 0 to L, it's another value depending from A, B and L.
I don't understand, what does "minimize the energy with respect to A and B" means. It already depends only from A, B and L.
c) It looks like that there must be some border values for energy, so it will be possible to determine A and B.
d) Exact particle is E=[STRIKE]h[/STRIKE]2/8mL2, just need to know A and B in the value from b) to compare.

a') <E>=-[STRIKE]h[/STRIKE]/2m*∫ψ(x)*(d2/dx2+x)[ψ(x)]*dx from 0 to L. Am I right in that solution? Or it is just -[STRIKE]h[/STRIKE]/2m*∫ψ(x)*(x)*ψ(x)*dx
b') have no idea, how to calculate correction for the ground state of the wave function.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The variational principle gives you an upper bound on the energy of the ground state; therefore, to get the best estimate, you want to find the least upper bound. In this case, your estimate will vary with A and B, so you want to find the value or values of A and B that minimize the function.
 
Thank you.
I've got 3 values of the <E>=5, 7 and 21 *([STRIKE]h[/STRIKE]2/mL2) after the finding derivatives of <E> with respect to A, B and AB.
So, the minimum of <E> is 5([STRIKE]h[/STRIKE]2/mL2).

But I'm still stuck with a') and b').
 
Vela, thanks for helping me!
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K