MHB Problem Regarding Left Unital Artinian Ring (set by Euge)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ring
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
Can someone please help me get started on the following problem:

Show that if A is a left unital Artinian ring, then:

... whenever $$x, y \in A$$ ...

we have ... $$xy = 1 \Longrightarrow yx = 1$$.Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter said:
Can someone please help me get started on the following problem:

Show that if A is a left unital Artinian ring, then:

... whenever $$x, y \in A$$ ...

we have ... $$xy = 1 \Longrightarrow yx = 1$$.Peter

Hi Peter,

Apply the descending chain condition to the chain $Ax \supseteq Ax^2 \supseteq \cdots$ and use the equation $xy = 1$ to show that $1 = ax$ for some $a \in A$.
 
Last edited:
Euge said:
Hi Peter,

Apply the descending chain condition to the chain $Aa \supseteq Aa^2 \supseteq \cdots$ and use the equation $xy = 1$ to show that $1 = ax$ for some $a \in A$.
Thanks for the help so far, Euge ... but I am going to need some more help ...

Analysis so far ...Given that A is Artinian, the descending chain condition implies that all descending chains become stationary at some point ... so there is some natural number r such that we have ...

$$ Aa \supseteq Aa^2 \supseteq Aa^3 \supseteq \ ... \ ... \ \supseteq Aa^r = Aa^{r + 1} = Aa^{r + 1} = Aa^{r + 2} = \ ... \ ... $$

Now ...

$$Aa^r = \{ ba^r \ | \ b \in A \}$$

and

$$Aa^{r + 1} = \{ ba^{r + 1} \ | \ b \in A \} $$

Now consider $$x \in A$$ such that $$xy = 1$$ ...

Given $$x \in A$$ we have $$xa^r \in Aa^r$$

But $$Aa^r = Aa^{r + 1}$$ so there exists a $$g \in Aa^{r + 1}$$ such that

$$xa^r = g = ha^{r + 1}$$ for some $$h \in A$$

Thus we have

$$x = ha
$$

so

$$xy = hay$$ so that $$1 = hay$$ ...

BUT ... where to from here?

Can you help?

Peter
 
Peter said:
Thanks for the help so far, Euge ... but I am going to need some more help ...

Analysis so far ...Given that A is Artinian, the descending chain condition implies that all descending chains become stationary at some point ... so there is some natural number r such that we have ...

$$ Aa \supseteq Aa^2 \supseteq Aa^3 \supseteq \ ... \ ... \ \supseteq Aa^r = Aa^{r + 1} = Aa^{r + 1} = Aa^{r + 2} = \ ... \ ... $$

Now ...

$$Aa^r = \{ ba^r \ | \ b \in A \}$$

and

$$Aa^{r + 1} = \{ ba^{r + 1} \ | \ b \in A \} $$

Now consider $$x \in A$$ such that $$xy = 1$$ ...

Given $$x \in A$$ we have $$xa^r \in Aa^r$$

But $$Aa^r = Aa^{r + 1}$$ so there exists a $$g \in Aa^{r + 1}$$ such that

$$xa^r = g = ha^{r + 1}$$ for some $$h \in A$$

Thus we have

$$x = ha
$$

so

$$xy = hay$$ so that $$1 = hay$$ ...

BUT ... where to from here?

Can you help?

Peter

Sorry Peter, I had a typo. Use the chain $Ax \supseteq Ax^2 \supseteq \cdots$. I made the correction in my earlier post. Since this chain stabilizes, there is an $r$ such that $Ax^r = Ax^{r+1}$. Since $x^r\in Ax^r$, $x^r = ax^{r+1}$ for some $a\in A$. Deduce from this that $1 = ax$ and hence $y = a$.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K