Problem Regarding Left Unital Artinian Ring (set by Euge)

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ring
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on proving that in a left unital Artinian ring A, if \(xy = 1\) for \(x, y \in A\), then \(yx = 1\). Participants emphasize applying the descending chain condition to the chain \(Ax \supseteq Ax^2 \supseteq \cdots\) to demonstrate that there exists a natural number \(r\) such that \(Ax^r = Ax^{r+1}\). This leads to the conclusion that \(1 = ax\) for some \(a \in A\), which ultimately shows that \(y = a\) and confirms the initial assertion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of left unital Artinian rings
  • Familiarity with the descending chain condition in ring theory
  • Knowledge of ring homomorphisms and their properties
  • Proficiency in manipulating algebraic expressions involving rings
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of left unital Artinian rings in detail
  • Learn about the descending chain condition and its implications in ring theory
  • Explore examples of left unital Artinian rings and their applications
  • Investigate the relationship between ring elements and their products in algebraic structures
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebraists, and students studying advanced ring theory, particularly those interested in the properties of Artinian rings and their applications in abstract algebra.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
Can someone please help me get started on the following problem:

Show that if A is a left unital Artinian ring, then:

... whenever $$x, y \in A$$ ...

we have ... $$xy = 1 \Longrightarrow yx = 1$$.Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter said:
Can someone please help me get started on the following problem:

Show that if A is a left unital Artinian ring, then:

... whenever $$x, y \in A$$ ...

we have ... $$xy = 1 \Longrightarrow yx = 1$$.Peter

Hi Peter,

Apply the descending chain condition to the chain $Ax \supseteq Ax^2 \supseteq \cdots$ and use the equation $xy = 1$ to show that $1 = ax$ for some $a \in A$.
 
Last edited:
Euge said:
Hi Peter,

Apply the descending chain condition to the chain $Aa \supseteq Aa^2 \supseteq \cdots$ and use the equation $xy = 1$ to show that $1 = ax$ for some $a \in A$.
Thanks for the help so far, Euge ... but I am going to need some more help ...

Analysis so far ...Given that A is Artinian, the descending chain condition implies that all descending chains become stationary at some point ... so there is some natural number r such that we have ...

$$ Aa \supseteq Aa^2 \supseteq Aa^3 \supseteq \ ... \ ... \ \supseteq Aa^r = Aa^{r + 1} = Aa^{r + 1} = Aa^{r + 2} = \ ... \ ... $$

Now ...

$$Aa^r = \{ ba^r \ | \ b \in A \}$$

and

$$Aa^{r + 1} = \{ ba^{r + 1} \ | \ b \in A \} $$

Now consider $$x \in A$$ such that $$xy = 1$$ ...

Given $$x \in A$$ we have $$xa^r \in Aa^r$$

But $$Aa^r = Aa^{r + 1}$$ so there exists a $$g \in Aa^{r + 1}$$ such that

$$xa^r = g = ha^{r + 1}$$ for some $$h \in A$$

Thus we have

$$x = ha
$$

so

$$xy = hay$$ so that $$1 = hay$$ ...

BUT ... where to from here?

Can you help?

Peter
 
Peter said:
Thanks for the help so far, Euge ... but I am going to need some more help ...

Analysis so far ...Given that A is Artinian, the descending chain condition implies that all descending chains become stationary at some point ... so there is some natural number r such that we have ...

$$ Aa \supseteq Aa^2 \supseteq Aa^3 \supseteq \ ... \ ... \ \supseteq Aa^r = Aa^{r + 1} = Aa^{r + 1} = Aa^{r + 2} = \ ... \ ... $$

Now ...

$$Aa^r = \{ ba^r \ | \ b \in A \}$$

and

$$Aa^{r + 1} = \{ ba^{r + 1} \ | \ b \in A \} $$

Now consider $$x \in A$$ such that $$xy = 1$$ ...

Given $$x \in A$$ we have $$xa^r \in Aa^r$$

But $$Aa^r = Aa^{r + 1}$$ so there exists a $$g \in Aa^{r + 1}$$ such that

$$xa^r = g = ha^{r + 1}$$ for some $$h \in A$$

Thus we have

$$x = ha
$$

so

$$xy = hay$$ so that $$1 = hay$$ ...

BUT ... where to from here?

Can you help?

Peter

Sorry Peter, I had a typo. Use the chain $Ax \supseteq Ax^2 \supseteq \cdots$. I made the correction in my earlier post. Since this chain stabilizes, there is an $r$ such that $Ax^r = Ax^{r+1}$. Since $x^r\in Ax^r$, $x^r = ax^{r+1}$ for some $a\in A$. Deduce from this that $1 = ax$ and hence $y = a$.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K