Problem understanding a statement in Bose Statistics

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Narcol2000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Statistics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the interpretation of Bose statistics, specifically regarding the energy states of two bosons occupying multiple energy levels. The equation for total energy, E_{ij} = e_i + e_j, indicates that there is only one unique quantum state for each distinct pair of energy levels (i ≠ j). The confusion arises from the assumption of equally spaced energy levels, which was not explicitly stated in the book. Clarification confirms that the unique state refers to the specific pairing of energy levels, e_1 + e_2, rather than multiple states yielding the same energy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Bose statistics and quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with quantum state notation and energy levels
  • Knowledge of the concept of indistinguishable particles
  • Basic grasp of statistical mechanics principles
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of indistinguishable particles in quantum mechanics
  • Study the concept of energy level spacing in quantum systems
  • Explore Bose-Einstein statistics and its applications
  • Learn about quantum state representations and their significance
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in physics, particularly those focusing on quantum mechanics, statistical mechanics, and Bose statistics.

Narcol2000
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
In a particular book I'm readin on Bose-statistics it metions having a system with two bosons and a large number of energy levels for which the two bosons can occupy. 0, e,2e,3e,4e etc..

It then says the total energy of a quantum state is [tex]E_{ij} = e_i + e_j[/tex] and that there is only one quantum state with this energy if i is not equal to j.

This last part makes no sense to me because clearly [tex]E_{14}[/tex] and [tex]E_{23}[/tex] are separate quantum states with the same energy 5e... unless they mean there is only one state with the energy separated specifically as [tex]e_1 + e_2[/tex]?

This is bugging me quite a bit so if anyone can confirm whether i on the right track I would be grateful.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Narcol2000 said:
unless they mean there is only one state with the energy separated specifically as [itex]e_1 + e_2[/itex]?

Yes, that's what they mean. Are you sure they said that the levels were equally spaced? If not, your problem does not arise.
 
Ah I see makes sense.

The preceeding example in the book was one with equally spaced levels and it wasn't clarified whether the levels in the subsequent example were equally space or not so for consistency i just assumed they were. The book wasn't particularly clear in this respect so I was just a bit confused at the time.

thanks for your reply.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
9K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
6K
Replies
10
Views
14K