Problem understanding Green's function equality in Messiah QM II

tobe
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

It's about green's function in the book Messiah - Quantum Mechanics II - Chapter 16.3.2
(see http://books.google.de/books?id=OJ1...dq=messiah+quantenmechanik+kapitel+16.3&hl=de). The book actually is in german, but I guess that doesn't matter understanding the formulas.
I don't understand the last equality between eq. (16.60) & (16.61). Why is there in the first term's nominator a 1 (instead of "z - H_o - lV")? Can somebody help me out?


Cheers
Tobe
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because the first term is

<br /> \frac{1}{z-H_0} \left( z - H_0 -\lambda V \right) \frac{1}{z - H_0 -\lambda V} = \frac{1}{z-H_0}.<br />
 
oh dammit! :D

thanks man!
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
10K
Back
Top